Pattern Intelligence · KLS

2542 quant read

The pattern is not clean enough for a strong directional call. The chart needs confirmation.

Open full chart Universe dashboard

Next week 50.0%

Unclear · avg analogue +0.34%

Low conviction

Next 4 weeks 48.1%

Unclear · avg analogue -0.37%

Low conviction

Live chart evidence Chart evidence is mixed

The current setup has both supportive and challenging components.

Quant agreement Evidence not decisive

A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close: 3.04
Trend Line: 2.96
Fair value: 2.92

Hover chart for weekly context.

Practical insights

What this is saying

Pattern Lab compares today’s setup with resolved historical setups. The useful question is not “does it look similar?” but “when it looked similar before, did price actually go higher?”

Bias: wait for confirmation A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Supportive

No core support block is clearly positive.

Headwinds

No core headwind block is clearly negative.

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.

Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -1.89%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue +0.25%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +1.99%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line +2.77%

Price is close to trend, so direction still needs confirmation.

Price vs Fair Value +4.16%

Price is close to Fair Value.

Market Dynamics +0.00

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength +0.02

Relative strength is not giving a clear edge.

Market Activity +0.03

This component is neutral.

Price Cycle +0.04

This component is neutral.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker	Week	Similarity	Outcome	4W return
I1XC34 SAO	2023-12-08	0.6161	higher	+0.64%
BFL ASX	2023-10-06	0.5958	higher	+1.92%
HAN LSE	2024-01-12	0.5722	higher	+2.95%
0212 HKG	2025-11-14	0.5651	higher	+0.07%
ADN MEX	2022-04-22	0.5597	flat	0.00%
6678 JPX	2023-05-26	0.5589	higher	+1.21%
MOG-B NYSE	2023-08-18	0.558	lower	-2.10%
MNIT SET	2026-05-01	0.5524	lower	-0.52%
UTLH LSE	2025-05-16	0.5489	lower	-1.08%
VNET LSE	2023-08-04	0.5476	higher	+3.21%
NISA TLV	2024-05-10	0.5472	higher	+6.69%
ACXN MEX	2023-08-11	0.5465	flat	0.00%

Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

Sector structure 1.03981
Volume pressure -0.95656
Trend Signal 0.57698
Close location 0.51406

This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.