Pattern Intelligence · SHZ

301119 quant read

The pattern is not clean enough for a strong directional call. The chart needs confirmation.

Open full chart Universe dashboard

Next week 53.4%

Unclear · avg analogue +1.29%

Low conviction

Next 4 weeks 61.8%

Likely higher · avg analogue +4.18%

Moderate conviction

Live chart evidence Chart evidence challenges the read

3 of the core evidence blocks are acting as headwinds.

Quant agreement Evidence not decisive

A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close: 23.61
Trend Line: 31.86
Fair value: 22.19

Hover chart for weekly context.

Practical insights

What this is saying

Pattern Lab compares today’s setup with resolved historical setups. The useful question is not “does it look similar?” but “when it looked similar before, did price actually go higher?”

Bias: wait for confirmation A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Supportive

Price Cycle: +0.06

Headwinds

Price vs Trend Line: -25.89%
Relative Strength: -0.30
Market Activity: -0.38

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.

Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -2.46%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue +6.66%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +13.79%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line -25.89%

Price is below trend, which keeps pressure on the setup.

Price vs Fair Value +6.39%

Price is close to Fair Value.

Market Dynamics -0.00

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength -0.30

The stock is lagging relative strength.

Market Activity -0.38

This component is a drag.

Price Cycle +0.06

This component is supportive.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker	Week	Similarity	Outcome	4W return
300811 SHZ	2022-05-20	0.7006	higher	+14.66%
S NYSE	2025-04-18	0.6763	higher	+20.15%
4050 SAU	2024-08-23	0.6716	higher	+20.62%
SRT GER	2022-03-04	0.669	higher	+4.60%
603185 SHH	2022-03-18	0.6671	lower	-18.29%
TRMD-A CPH	2024-11-15	0.6665	lower	-16.95%
2250 SAU	2022-03-11	0.6583	lower	-0.14%
EXCELINDUS NSI	2025-03-28	0.6571	higher	+10.93%
LAR0 GER	2022-05-20	0.6568	lower	-12.01%
ISCN TLV	2022-07-29	0.6558	higher	+11.16%
HOMEFIRST NSI	2026-01-02	0.655	higher	+6.66%
ARB ASX	2022-05-06	0.6528	lower	-3.24%

Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

Sector structure -4.45425
Volume pressure 0.98632
Market Activity -0.47565
Trend Signal -0.42302

This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.