Pattern Intelligence · MCE

COL quant read

The pattern is not clean enough for a strong directional call. The chart needs confirmation.

Open full chart Universe dashboard

Next week 49.4%

Unclear · avg analogue +0.72%

Low conviction

Next 4 weeks 39.9%

Likely lower · avg analogue -0.06%

Moderate conviction

Live chart evidence Chart evidence is mixed

The current setup has both supportive and challenging components.

Quant agreement Evidence not decisive

A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close: 5.45
Trend Line: 5.33
Fair value: 5.32

Hover chart for weekly context.

Practical insights

What this is saying

Pattern Lab compares today’s setup with resolved historical setups. The useful question is not “does it look similar?” but “when it looked similar before, did price actually go higher?”

Bias: wait for confirmation A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Supportive

No core support block is clearly positive.

Headwinds

Relative Strength: -0.13

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.

Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -3.84%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue -0.37%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +3.90%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line +2.20%

Price is close to trend, so direction still needs confirmation.

Price vs Fair Value +2.37%

Price is close to Fair Value.

Market Dynamics +0.01

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength -0.13

The stock is lagging relative strength.

Market Activity -0.00

This component is neutral.

Price Cycle +0.02

This component is neutral.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker	Week	Similarity	Outcome	4W return
3562 JPX	2024-06-28	0.6356	lower	-3.35%
ACOMO AMS	2023-04-14	0.6354	higher	+2.74%
PINE3 SAO	2023-04-07	0.6278	flat	0.00%
UZU GER	2023-04-14	0.6205	lower	-0.93%
6758 JPX	2023-04-14	0.6095	higher	+5.53%
9740 JPX	2024-06-21	0.609	lower	-8.60%
4521 JPX	2021-06-04	0.5974	higher	+4.52%
EQR NYSE	2024-04-26	0.5955	higher	+0.86%
VRTS NYSE	2025-09-26	0.5947	lower	-13.45%
AEM NYSE	2022-05-13	0.5944	higher	+7.46%
GLENMARK NSI	2023-01-13	0.5887	lower	-4.70%
5757 JPX	2022-01-21	0.5885	lower	-1.95%

Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

Sector structure -1.98632
Trend Signal 0.57698
Volume pressure 0.54887
Close location 0.47295

This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.