Pattern Intelligence · STO

ALIF-B quant read

The pattern is not clean enough for a strong directional call. The chart needs confirmation.

Open full chart Universe dashboard

Next week 40.0%

Unclear · avg analogue -1.11%

Moderate conviction

Next 4 weeks 46.2%

Unclear · avg analogue +2.22%

Low conviction

Live chart evidence Chart evidence supports the read

4 of the core evidence blocks are supportive.

Quant agreement Evidence not decisive

A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close: 159.60
Trend Line: 149.92
Fair value: 138.16

Hover chart for weekly context.

Practical insights

What this is saying

Pattern Lab compares today’s setup with resolved historical setups. The useful question is not “does it look similar?” but “when it looked similar before, did price actually go higher?”

Bias: wait for confirmation A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Supportive

Price vs Trend Line: +6.46%
Price vs Fair Value: +15.52%
Market Activity: +0.38
Price Cycle: +0.16

Headwinds

Relative Strength: -0.11

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.

Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -7.32%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue -1.05%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +4.42%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line +6.46%

Price is comfortably above its medium-term trend.

Price vs Fair Value +15.52%

Price is stretched above the current Fair Value estimate.

Market Dynamics +0.01

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength -0.11

The stock is lagging relative strength.

Market Activity +0.38

This component is supportive.

Price Cycle +0.16

This component is supportive.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker	Week	Similarity	Outcome	4W return
PRN ASX	2024-06-28	0.7219	higher	+4.50%
BP LSE	2025-02-14	0.7173	lower	-8.28%
VETO PAR	2023-04-07	0.6809	higher	+9.69%
FSKRS HEL	2023-01-27	0.6726	lower	-2.00%
GVPIL NSI	2025-07-18	0.6716	higher	+11.40%
PARACABLES NSI	2025-08-08	0.6654	lower	-10.48%
TEL2-B STO	2023-04-14	0.6653	lower	-0.95%
CIVB NASDAQ	2023-09-08	0.6644	lower	-2.83%
DECK NYSE	2022-08-19	0.6614	higher	+3.02%
IBAB BRU	2024-02-16	0.6599	higher	+9.90%
SHREDIGCEM NSI	2025-07-18	0.6587	lower	-5.06%
002517 SHZ	2021-07-02	0.6578	lower	-2.34%

Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

Sector structure -1.19546
Trend Signal 0.57698
Volume pressure -0.44044
Market Activity 0.29056

This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.