Pattern Intelligence · SHH

600683 quant read

The pattern is not clean enough for a strong directional call. The chart needs confirmation.

Next week 49.8%

Unclear · avg analogue +3.24%

Low conviction
Next 4 weeks 49.1%

Unclear · avg analogue +0.58%

Low conviction
Live chart evidence Chart evidence supports the read

5 of the core evidence blocks are supportive.

Quant agreement Evidence not decisive

A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close
10.35
Trend Line
9.67
Fair value
5.54
Hover chart for weekly context.

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.
Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -9.37%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue +0.69%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +11.20%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line +7.04%

Price is comfortably above its medium-term trend.

Price vs Fair Value +86.73%

Price is stretched above the current Fair Value estimate.

Market Dynamics -0.01

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength +0.39

The stock is showing relative leadership.

Market Activity +0.33

This component is supportive.

Price Cycle +0.87

This component is supportive.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker Week Similarity Outcome 4W return
NP5
GER
2026-02-27 0.8564 lower -22.61%
YU
LSE
2023-04-14 0.847 lower -4.65%
SPRINT
STO
2026-06-12 0.8271 higher +4.89%
5892
JPX
2025-10-10 0.8258 lower -8.43%
BTML
NSI
2023-03-31 0.8211 higher +3.61%
9519
JPX
2021-03-19 0.8167 higher +7.74%
TIRA
JKT
2025-07-18 0.815 higher +11.17%
0108
HKG
2026-02-13 0.8147 higher +24.58%
SPMA
JKT
2022-03-11 0.8144 lower -3.47%
6626
JPX
2021-12-24 0.8136 lower -18.19%
KOD
NASDAQ
2026-01-16 0.8128 lower -18.71%
PPL
ASX
2022-01-14 0.8126 higher +6.67%
Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

  • Price vs Fair Value 0.80483
  • Price Cycle 0.79832
  • Volume pressure -0.63924
  • Trend Signal 0.57698
This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.