Pattern Intelligence · SHZ

002755 quant read

The pattern is not clean enough for a strong directional call. The chart needs confirmation.

Open full chart Universe dashboard

Next week 43.2%

Unclear · avg analogue +2.10%

Low conviction

Next 4 weeks 49.1%

Unclear · avg analogue +0.59%

Low conviction

Live chart evidence Chart evidence challenges the read

3 of the core evidence blocks are acting as headwinds.

Quant agreement Evidence not decisive

A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close: 14.75
Trend Line: 15.65
Fair value: 13.90

Hover chart for weekly context.

Practical insights

What this is saying

Pattern Lab compares today’s setup with resolved historical setups. The useful question is not “does it look similar?” but “when it looked similar before, did price actually go higher?”

Bias: wait for confirmation A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Supportive

Price Cycle: +0.06

Headwinds

Price vs Trend Line: -5.76%
Relative Strength: -0.28
Market Activity: -0.33

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.

Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -5.27%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue +0.61%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +8.04%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line -5.76%

Price is below trend, which keeps pressure on the setup.

Price vs Fair Value +6.12%

Price is close to Fair Value.

Market Dynamics -0.00

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength -0.28

The stock is lagging relative strength.

Market Activity -0.33

This component is a drag.

Price Cycle +0.06

This component is supportive.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker	Week	Similarity	Outcome	4W return
603233 SHH	2021-11-12	0.6936	higher	+1.97%
KRAS JKT	2022-07-29	0.6916	higher	+1.55%
TOKMAN HEL	2022-10-21	0.6914	higher	+10.81%
ALCGM PAR	2024-12-20	0.6872	lower	-5.41%
8050 SAU	2025-07-04	0.684	lower	-5.77%
ASY LSE	2025-04-18	0.6832	higher	+4.87%
AVOL EBS	2022-10-21	0.6827	higher	+19.12%
603949 SHH	2024-08-09	0.6813	lower	-2.83%
GLA1V HEL	2026-04-10	0.6801	higher	+8.94%
TNK NYSE	2025-04-18	0.6781	higher	+17.55%
EAAS LSE	2022-11-04	0.6772	lower	-46.41%
DIA MIL	2026-04-10	0.6767	higher	+3.44%

Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

Sector structure -2.03804
Trend Signal -0.42302
Market Activity -0.41757
Volume pressure 0.40737

This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.