Pattern Intelligence · NASDAQ

PRAA quant read

The pattern is not clean enough for a strong directional call. The chart needs confirmation.

Next week 64.5%

Likely higher · avg analogue +2.68%

Moderate conviction
Next 4 weeks 53.2%

Unclear · avg analogue +2.39%

Low conviction
Live chart evidence Chart evidence supports the read

2 of the core evidence blocks are supportive.

Quant agreement Evidence not decisive

A decisive weekly close that pulls the 1-week and 4-week evidence into agreement.

Current weekly tape

Price, trend line, and fair value

Use this to anchor the probability read to the actual chart. A bearish analogue read is more serious when price is below trend or stretched above fair value.

Close
18.49
Trend Line
16.70
Fair value
19.35
Hover chart for weekly context.

Signal stack

What changed underneath price?

Each signal is standardized against its own recent history, so the lines show whether the current reading is unusually strong or weak for this stock.

Hover for standardized signal values.

Historical memory

Nearest 4-week analogue returns

Bars are the forward 4-week returns from the closest resolved examples, ordered by similarity. Red clustering is the warning sign.

Hover for analogue return and similarity rank.
Outcome frame

Range of outcomes from the nearest 4-week analogues

This is not a forecast range. It is the historical distribution of similar setups, translated into bear/base/bull context.

Bear case -4.84%

What weaker historical analogues tended to deliver.

Base analogue +0.69%

The middle outcome from the nearest resolved examples.

Bull case +5.46%

What stronger historical analogues tended to deliver.

Evidence stack

Why the model sees this setup

These are the current conditions feeding the analogue read. The point is not the number alone; it is whether the evidence agrees with the probability read.

Price vs Trend Line +10.74%

Price is comfortably above its medium-term trend.

Price vs Fair Value -4.46%

Price is close to Fair Value.

Market Dynamics -0.00

Market Dynamics are neutral.

Relative Strength -0.03

Relative strength is not giving a clear edge.

Market Activity +0.23

This component is supportive.

Price Cycle -0.04

This component is neutral.

Historical rhymes

Closest resolved setups

The table keeps the model honest: these are the actual examples behind the headline odds.

Ticker Week Similarity Outcome 4W return
GENUSPAPER
NSI
2026-06-12 0.8822 lower -6.89%
SBRE
LSE
2026-06-12 0.8727 higher +10.29%
WFG
NYSE
2026-06-12 0.8649 lower -2.12%
CKI
LSE
2026-06-12 0.8386 higher +3.61%
XPER
NYSE
2026-06-12 0.8382 higher +1.04%
MINDTECK
NSI
2026-06-12 0.8321 higher +1.20%
OGI
TOR
2026-06-12 0.8284 lower -8.05%
AMA
ASX
2026-06-12 0.8238 lower -1.09%
KMEW
NSI
2026-06-12 0.8102 higher +25.49%
KITEX
NSI
2026-06-12 0.8054 higher +5.74%
OBIO
NASDAQ
2026-06-12 0.7999 lower -2.68%
SHOE
LSE
2026-06-12 0.7957 lower -5.00%
Distinctive drivers

What made this setup unusual

These are the largest deviations from the run baseline, renamed into plain market language.

  • Sector structure -0.67099
  • Quality context 0.65938
  • Momentum context 0.65938
  • Trend Signal 0.57698
This is historical analogue evidence, not advice. It becomes more useful when probability, average return, chart evidence, and nearby examples all point in the same direction.