Ticker Short Interest

LILA Short Interest Intelligence

Liberty Latin America Ltd positioning pressure, squeeze risk, bearish conviction, crowding, days to cover, and price-positioning divergence.

Latest settlement 30 Jun 2026 Squeeze Pressure

Squeeze Pressure

Shorts Under Pressure

LILA is classified as Squeeze Pressure. Latest reported short interest is 1.0M shares; short interest changed +22.8%, price moved +28.6% since the previous report, short interest is in the 100th percentile, and days to cover is in the 14th percentile. Trend context is constructive.

Setup Score85/100Squeeze Pressure
Reported Short Interest1.0M+22.8% vs prior report
Days To Cover1.0014.29 percentile
Price Reaction+28.6%since previous short report
Squeeze Pressure85crowding, trend, and pressure
Bearish Conviction50shorts adding into weakness

Reported Short Interest

2026-03-31 to 2026-06-30

Days To Cover

liquidity pressure

Short Interest Change

report-to-report

Price Context

2026-03-20 to 2026-06-26

Squeeze Radar

85

Elevated short interest becomes most interesting when price strength forces shorts to defend or cover.

Bearish Conviction

50

Rising short interest alongside weak trend can mean the bearish trade is being reinforced, not trapped.

Crowding

61

Latest short interest is 1.0M shares and days to cover is 1.00.

Divergence

73

Short interest rose while price rose. Bearish positioning is adding into strength, which can create squeeze pressure if the chart keeps improving.

Report History

LILA Short Interest Ledger

Most recent first
SettlementShort interestPreviousChangeDays coverAverage volume
30 Jun 2026 1029858 838802 22.8% 1.00 1638620
15 Jun 2026 838802 817594 2.6% 1.84 455893
29 May 2026 817594 764817 6.9% 1.68 487444
15 May 2026 764817 639710 19.6% 1.97 388251
30 Apr 2026 639710 642501 -0.4% 3.02 211771
15 Apr 2026 642501 690421 -6.9% 3.09 207684
31 Mar 2026 690421 647292 6.7% 1.89 364794

Short interest is delayed, reported on a periodic schedule, and may be revised. The dashboard is research context only and does not prove real-time short activity.