Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/c2bf3cdb-0cc2-46a1-8c7c-21fd1865c9d9/
AKT-A
AKITA Drilling Ltd.Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
7 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.870
↗
Trending Value
#2.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 7.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
23.9%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F9
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 86th
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 2.01
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
86.0%ile
P/E
15.7×
P/S
0.7×
P/B
0.9×
E/P
0.0310
FCF Yield
0.074
EBITDA/EV
0.239
SH Yield
0.010
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
5.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
7.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
9.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 7.4% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 7.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
27.0%ile
ROE
0.055
ROA
0.040
Net Margin
0.047
Op Margin
0.027
GPA
0.107
Current
2.66
F-Score
9/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.039
Earn Growth
0.102
Stability
1.305
lower=better
Accruals
-0.121
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
F-Score of 9/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
86.0%ile
6M Return
98.5%
12M Return
91.0%
12-1 Mom
109.0%
Risk-Adj
2.01
Vol 252d
54.2%
Vol 60d
125.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-25.3%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 109% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 2.01 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (126%) is expanding vs long-term (54%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.87
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Energy
· 94 peers
Sector Value %ile
84.2%
Sector Quality %ile
40.0%
P/E z-score
-0.29
P/B z-score
-0.62
Sector Avg OS
54.0%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (86th value) with strong momentum (86th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 9/9 with good value (86th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (86th value) but weak quality (27th). Classic value trap risk.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (86th) but high volatility (54%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (126%) significantly exceeds 252-day (54%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
68.2% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
42.5% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
A
93.8% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
26.4% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.870 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.860 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.270 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.860 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 9.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.542 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
15.68
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0310
Price / Sales
0.73
Price / Book
0.87
Price / Cash Flow
3.88
FCF Yield
7.4%
EBITDA / EV
23.9%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.1500
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
1.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
5.5%
Return on Assets
4.0%
Net Margin
4.7%
Operating Margin
2.7%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
10.7%
Current Ratio
2.66
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.121
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.006
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
98.5%
12M Return
91.0%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
109.0%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
2.01
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
3.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
10.2%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.305
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
9
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
1.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
5
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
7
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
9
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
2
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity