Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/
Factor Intelligence
Live
5315
All Stocks (>$200M)
49
Market Leaders
30
Tiny Titans
306
Veiled Value
1281
5yr+ Earners
506
Trending Value
740
Quality Bargains
511
Deep Value
1354
High Conviction
2216
Dividend Payers
982
Yield ≥ 3%
Value × Quality Scatter
Top-right = cheap + high quality. Click any dot to open its page. Showing 1585 names.
Top 50%
High Momentum
Medium Momentum
Factor Combinations
Which factors to combine for maximum edge — and which to avoid doubling up
13
Diversifying Pairs
4
Redundant Pairs
4
Anti-Correlated
Factor Combinations
Which factors to combine for maximum edge — and which to avoid doubling up
13
Diversifying Pairs
4
Redundant Pairs
4
Anti-Correlated
Correlation Intelligence
Correlation Heatmap
Blue = uncorrelated (combine). Red = redundant (pick one).
Strategy Pair Correlations
Lower bar = less overlap = more diversification benefit.
Best Factor Triples
Avg pairwise |ρ|. Lower = more independent = higher alpha potential.
Signal Dispersion & Pair Analysis
Factor Dispersion (P10–P90)
Wider spread = factors differentiate stocks well = more stock-picking opportunity.
Redundant Pairs
High correlation = overlapping signals. Using both adds little edge.
Diversifying Pairs
Near-zero or negative correlation = independent signals. These combos add real alpha.
O'Shaughnessy Factor Strategies — What the Correlations Tell Us
Trending Value
ρ=-0.064
Strict O'Shaughnessy construction: cheapest VC2 cohort paired with 6M momentum leadership.
Anti-correlated
→ Screen This Strategy
Quality at a Price
ρ=0.05
Low correlation: cheap stocks aren't high quality — combining filters value traps.
Low overlap
→ Screen This Strategy
EBITDA/EV + Piotroski
ρ=0.086
Best single value factor + health screen. Low overlap = genuine signal combination.
Low overlap
→ Screen This Strategy
SH Yield + Momentum
ρ=0.181
Cash return + price confirmation. Different signals, powerful combination.
Moderate
→ Screen This Strategy
△ Top Factor Triples — Maximum Independence
#1
Momentum 6M + Quality% + VC2
Avg |ρ|0.055
Max |ρ|0.064
Momentum 6M ↔ Quality%: -0.039 · Momentum 6M ↔ VC2: -0.064 · Quality% ↔ VC2: -0.063
★ Optimal
#2
Momentum 6M + Quality% + Value%
Avg |ρ|0.058
Max |ρ|0.084
Momentum 6M ↔ Quality%: -0.039 · Momentum 6M ↔ Value%: 0.084 · Quality% ↔ Value%: 0.05
★ Optimal
#3
EBITDA/EV + Momentum 6M + Quality%
Avg |ρ|0.102
Max |ρ|0.146
EBITDA/EV ↔ Momentum 6M: -0.146 · EBITDA/EV ↔ Quality%: -0.122 · Momentum 6M ↔ Quality%: -0.039
★ Strong
#4
F-Score + Momentum 6M + Value%
Avg |ρ|0.113
Max |ρ|0.21
F-Score ↔ Momentum 6M: 0.21 · F-Score ↔ Value%: -0.044 · Momentum 6M ↔ Value%: 0.084
★ Strong
#5
F-Score + Momentum 6M + VC2
Avg |ρ|0.119
Max |ρ|0.21
F-Score ↔ Momentum 6M: 0.21 · F-Score ↔ VC2: 0.084 · Momentum 6M ↔ VC2: -0.064
★ Strong
Value
P/E · P/S · P/B · P/CF · EBITDA/EV · Shareholder Yield · VC2
Value
P/E · P/S · P/B · P/CF · EBITDA/EV · Shareholder Yield · VC2
1104
837
908
P/E <15 (cheap)
P/E 15-30 (fair)
P/E >30 (expensive)
Med EY: 5.13%
%Earnings Yield
▓VC2 Composite
≡P/E Histogram
19.4×
Med P/E
2.0×
Med P/S
1.7×
Med P/B
11.1×
Med P/CF
8.4%
EBITDA/EV
1104
P/E < 15
1347
P/B < 1
1393
P/S < 1
908
P/E > 30
0.0%
Med SH Yield
5.64%
Med FCF Yield
2.66%
Med Div Yield
Quality
ROE · ROA · Margins · F-Score · Accruals · D/E · Stability
Quality
ROE · ROA · Margins · F-Score · Accruals · D/E · Stability
884
2770
1656
F-Score ≥7 (strong)
F-Score 4-6 (neutral)
F-Score ≤3 (weak)
Profitable: 2839 / 5234
RROE Distribution
⚑F-Score Distribution
Strong (≥7): 884
Weak (≤3): 1656
◎Signal Confidence
High: 4632Med: 553Low: 130
0
≤30 days
10
31–60 days
113
61–90 days
5192
>90 days
Median data age: 158d
4.7%
Med ROE
0.9%
Med ROA
6.8%
Med Op Margin
3.3%
Med Net Margin
2839
Profitable
1943
Unprofitable
1.16×
Med D/E
1.76×
Current Ratio
-4.6%
Accrual Ratio
Momentum
6M · 12M · 12-1 · Risk-Adjusted · Breadth · Growth
Momentum
6M · 12M · 12-1 · Risk-Adjusted · Breadth · Growth
2731
2169
12M positive (55.7%)
12M negative
6M Breadth: 50.5%
≡12M Return Distribution
∿Volatility Distribution
▧Sector Breakdown
55.7%
12M Breadth
50.5%
6M Breadth
6.3%
12M Med Return
0.4%
6M Med Return
0.21
Risk-Adj Mom
106.1%
60d Vol
49.0%
252d Vol
5066
Vol Expanding
2928
Severe DD >30%
6.5%
Rev Growth Med
11.0%
Earn Growth Med
1026
Rev > 20%
OS Composite
Value × Quality × Momentum — the unified O’Shaughnessy score
OS Composite
Value × Quality × Momentum — the unified O’Shaughnessy score
449
1632
1105
2068
Vol <20% (low risk)
20-40%
40-60%
60%+ (high risk)
Med Vol: 49.0%
≡Sector 12M Returns
◔Market Cap Mix
▥Factor Scores by Cap
49.0%
Med Vol
-100.0%
Worst DD
449
Vol <20%
1632
Vol 20-40%
1105
Vol 40-60%
2068
Vol 60%+
20
Net Repurchasers
30
Net Issuers
⚠
25 Value Traps Detected
Cheap stocks with deteriorating fundamentals
View Full Analysis →
Sector Intelligence
Factor tilts, valuation, quality, and risk by sector — where the opportunities concentrate
Sector Intelligence
Factor tilts, valuation, quality, and risk by sector — where the opportunities concentrate
Value vs Quality by Sector (higher = better)
Risk vs Return by Sector
Valuation by Sector (P/E)
Profitability (ROE) by Sector
Shareholder Yield by Sector
Leverage (D/E) by Sector
Sector
N
Value %
Quality %
Mom %
OS %
P/E
P/B
ROE
SH Yield
FCF Yield
D/E
F-Score
12M Mom
Vol
Max DD
TV
V-Q Gap
1038
42.2%
43.4%
48.1%
41.0%
23.3
2.51
-32.1%
0.0%
-8.01%
0.52
3.0
0.6%
113.5%
-46.5%
21
-1.2
1002
62.0%
56.9%
50.3%
62.7%
13.1
1.21
9.0%
1.51%
6.93%
4.56
5.0
10.2%
40.2%
-16.0%
132
+5.1
745
37.3%
51.4%
48.2%
39.6%
31.1
3.18
3.0%
0.0%
3.91%
0.79
5.0
-8.2%
96.7%
-46.1%
34
-14.1
665
41.1%
46.6%
53.1%
42.6%
27.5
2.65
7.7%
0.0%
5.24%
1.19
5.0
11.0%
102.4%
-33.3%
45
-5.5
536
55.7%
46.3%
43.3%
51.4%
19.6
1.59
4.6%
0.0%
9.41%
1.52
5.0
-5.2%
73.1%
-39.9%
81
+9.4
265
56.4%
52.2%
45.8%
54.9%
14.8
1.32
4.5%
0.0%
7.79%
1.05
5.0
-10.3%
83.9%
-44.3%
45
+4.2
253
42.0%
44.3%
47.5%
40.7%
25.6
1.28
4.7%
4.85%
5.75%
1.44
5.0
8.7%
40.4%
-18.6%
18
-2.3
237
55.5%
47.7%
39.2%
50.1%
17.2
1.65
6.4%
0.0%
8.83%
1.26
5.0
-15.2%
73.5%
-37.0%
40
+7.8
225
53.4%
47.9%
59.0%
54.9%
18.0
1.86
6.1%
0.32%
9.09%
0.85
5.0
23.7%
67.4%
-32.0%
22
+5.5