Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/1e90353f-cd0e-4b31-98da-e2d7dabbf918/
LAU
Lindsay Australia LimitedSnapshot 2026-07-26 · 1.1w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
7 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.800
↗
Trending Value
#17
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.877
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 4
📐
EBITDA/EV
20.4%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
5.5%
💰
High Yield
Div 5.5%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
95.0%ile
P/E
13.9×
P/S
0.3×
P/B
1.6×
E/P
0.0748
FCF Yield
0.118
EBITDA/EV
0.204
SH Yield
0.055
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
5.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
4.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
5.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 11.8% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 4.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
81.0%ile
ROE
0.112
ROA
0.028
Net Margin
0.020
Op Margin
0.040
GPA
0.994
Current
1.56
F-Score
2/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.056
Earn Growth
-0.372
5yr Consist
No
F-Score of 2/9 flags fundamental deterioration — multiple signals are weakening.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
12.0%ile
6M Return
2.0%
12M Return
-10.3%
12-1 Mom
-20.5%
Risk-Adj
-0.76
Vol 252d
27.2%
Vol 60d
62.1%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-25.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -21% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (62%) is expanding vs long-term (27%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.8
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 129 peers
Sector Value %ile
92.3%
Sector Quality %ile
65.4%
P/E z-score
-0.38
P/B z-score
-0.21
Sector Avg OS
52.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (95th) and quality (81th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (12th) despite looking cheap (95th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 5.5% backed by 11.8% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (62%) significantly exceeds 252-day (27%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
83.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
39.6% avg (6 factors)
Momentum
F
18.5% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
71.4% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.800 | —5 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.950 | —8 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.810 | —5 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.120 | —8 | — | |
| F-Score | 2.000 | —8 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.451 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.272 | —0 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
13.90
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0748
Price / Sales
0.28
Price / Book
1.55
FCF Yield
11.8%
EBITDA / EV
20.4%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.8754
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
5.5%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
11.2%
Return on Assets
2.8%
Net Margin
2.0%
Operating Margin
4.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
99.4%
Current Ratio
1.56
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
2.0%
12M Return
-10.3%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-20.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.76
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
5.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-37.2%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
2
Dividend Yield
5.5%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
5
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
4
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
5
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
17
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity