Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/52c719e5-14c3-477f-a12b-7bf5edad050d/

KSL

Kina Securities Limited
Chart
1.23 AUD
Latest Week 2026-07-17
Financial ServicesFinancial ConglomeratesSMALL
Snapshot 2026-07-19 · 0.7w · Fresh
0.97
OS Score
96.0%
Value
85.0%
Quality
83.0%
Momentum
#13.00000000
TV Rank
3/9
F-Score
0.903
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
8 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.970
↗
Trending Value
#13
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.903
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 4
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +13%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
3.6%
💰
High Yield
Div 8.4%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 13%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
96.0%ile
P/E
3.2×
P/S
0.7×
P/B
0.5×
FCF Yield
0.233
SH Yield
0.036
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
3.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
4.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
3.00000000
/100
P/E of 3.2x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 23.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 4.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
85.0%ile
ROE
0.160
ROA
0.021
Net Margin
0.211
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.131
Earn Growth
0.123
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
83.0%ile
6M Return
7.2%
12M Return
-0.5%
12-1 Mom
8.4%
Risk-Adj
0.65
Vol 252d
13.0%
Vol 60d
27.5%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-9.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (27%) is expanding vs long-term (13%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.97
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services · 159 peers
Sector Value %ile
99.4%
Sector Quality %ile
75.0%
P/E z-score
-0.44
P/B z-score
-0.09
Sector Avg OS
53.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
TWR Tower Limited 99.0% 98.0% 95.0% 88.0%
HLI Helia Group Limited 99.0% 96.0% 96.0% 92.0%
SVR Solvar Limited 98.0% 96.0% 96.0% 85.0%
PNC Pioneer Credit Limited 97.0% 88.0% 91.0% 93.0%
BFL BSP Financial Group Limited 97.0% 95.0% 89.0% 83.0%
ACQ Acorn Capital Investment Fund Limited 97.0% 92.0% 88.0% 89.0%
MFF MFF Capital Investments Limited 96.0% 90.0% 85.0% 89.0%
ANZ ANZ Group Holdings Limited 96.0% 90.0% 87.0% 89.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (96th) and quality (85th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (96th value) with strong momentum (83th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (27%) significantly exceeds 252-day (13%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
89.6% avg (5 factors)
Quality
C
47.7% avg (3 factors)
Momentum
D
41.3% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
94.9% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends7 snapshots
Factor Persistence7 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.970—7—
Value %ile0.960—7—
Quality %ile0.850—7—
Momentum %ile0.830—7—
F-Score3.000—7—
Confidence0.527—0—
Volatility0.130—7—
Value Lens2021-07-20 → 2026-07-19
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
3.16
Price / Sales
0.67
Price / Book
0.50
FCF Yield
23.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.4992
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
3.6%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
16.0%
Return on Assets
2.1%
Net Margin
21.1%
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
7.2%
12M Return
-0.5%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
8.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.65
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
13.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
12.3%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
8.4%
Buyback Yield
-4.8%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
3
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
4
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
3
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
13
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity