Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/5cae5aef-4f9a-4203-b536-10d65df7ccf5/
ERCG
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
11 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.990
↗
Trending Value
#4.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.923
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 1.5
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 1.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
179.0%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
25.3%
💰
High Yield
Div 25.3%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 85%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.93
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
99.0%ile
P/E
1.5×
P/S
0.2×
P/B
0.4×
E/P
0.6658
FCF Yield
1.302
EBITDA/EV
1.790
SH Yield
0.253
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
1.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
1.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
1.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.5x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 130.2% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 1.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
86.0%ile
ROE
0.246
ROA
0.087
Net Margin
0.109
Op Margin
0.114
GPA
0.377
Current
1.12
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.045
Stability
0.685
lower=better
Accruals
-0.037
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 25% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
92.0%ile
6M Return
63.4%
12M Return
107.2%
12-1 Mom
84.5%
Risk-Adj
1.93
Vol 252d
43.8%
Vol 60d
104.2%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-16.6%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 85% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 1.93 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (104%) is expanding vs long-term (44%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.99
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Technology
· 121 peers
Sector Value %ile
100.0%
Sector Quality %ile
73.8%
P/E z-score
-0.22
P/B z-score
-0.74
Sector Avg OS
37.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (99th) and quality (86th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (99th value) with strong momentum (92th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 25.3% backed by 130.2% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (92th) but high volatility (44%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (104%) significantly exceeds 252-day (44%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
100.0% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
55.5% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
A
93.3% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
43.6% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.990 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.990 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.860 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.920 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 7.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.939 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.438 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.50
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.6658
Price / Sales
0.16
Price / Book
0.37
Price / Cash Flow
1.05
FCF Yield
130.2%
EBITDA / EV
179.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
9.3234
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
25.3%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
24.6%
Return on Assets
8.7%
Net Margin
10.9%
Operating Margin
11.4%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
37.7%
Current Ratio
1.12
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.037
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
63.4%
12M Return
107.2%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
84.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.93
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-4.5%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.685
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
25.3%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
1
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
1
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
1
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
4
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity