Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/6cca9e0b-d540-4862-a8e5-ce85d50959b8/

OMSE

OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
Chart
4.36 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-17
Snapshot 2026-07-19 · 0.6w · Fresh
0.88
OS Score
97.0%
Value
95.0%
Quality
6.0%
Momentum
#68.00000000
TV Rank
6/9
F-Score
0.960
QV
Strategy Eligibility
6 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.880
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.960
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
P/E 5.7
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 9
📐
EBITDA/EV
95.5%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 97%
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
97.0%ile
P/E
5.7×
P/S
1.2×
P/B
1.0×
E/P
0.8206
FCF Yield
1.179
EBITDA/EV
0.955
SH Yield
-0.165
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
4.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
9.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
10.00000000
/100
P/E of 5.7x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 117.9% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 9.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
95.0%ile
ROE
0.170
ROA
0.136
Net Margin
0.207
Op Margin
0.249
GPA
0.199
D/E
0.21
Current
6.65
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.234
Earn Growth
-0.281
Accruals
-0.092
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Conservative balance sheet with D/E of 0.21.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
6.0%ile
6M Return
-13.3%
12M Return
-37.3%
12-1 Mom
-41.6%
Risk-Adj
-0.59
Vol 252d
70.3%
Vol 60d
107.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-53.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -42% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (108%) is expanding vs long-term (70%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.88
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Energy · 218 peers
Sector Value %ile
98.2%
Sector Quality %ile
95.9%
P/E z-score
-0.68
P/B z-score
-0.08
Sector Avg OS
69.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. 99.0% 96.0% 94.0% 97.0%
PBR Petroleo Brasileiro Petrobras SA ADR 99.0% 96.0% 91.0% 86.0%
APA APA Corporation 99.0% 95.0% 96.0% 92.0%
SU Suncor Energy Inc 98.0% 93.0% 90.0% 87.0%
TK Teekay Corporation 98.0% 98.0% 76.0% 86.0%
INSW International Seaways Inc 98.0% 90.0% 90.0% 96.0%
PBR-A Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras 98.0% 97.0% 90.0% 84.0%
TRMD Torm PLC Class A 98.0% 94.0% 79.0% 90.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (97th) and quality (95th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (6th) despite looking cheap (97th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (108%) significantly exceeds 252-day (70%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
83.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
77.4% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
7.8% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
0.0% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends7 snapshots
Factor Persistence7 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.880—7
Value %ile0.970—7
Quality %ile0.950—7
Momentum %ile0.060—7
F-Score6.000—0
Confidence0.940—7
Volatility0.703—7
Value Lens2021-07-20 → 2026-07-19
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
5.75
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.8206
Price / Sales
1.19
Price / Book
0.98
Price / Cash Flow
3.42
FCF Yield
117.9%
EBITDA / EV
95.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
3.2976
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-16.5%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
17.0%
Return on Assets
13.6%
Net Margin
20.7%
Operating Margin
24.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
19.9%
Debt / Equity
0.21
Current Ratio
6.65
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.092
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-13.3%
12M Return
-37.3%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-41.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.59
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-23.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-28.1%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-16.5%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
4
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
9
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
10
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
68
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity