Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/78414695-7921-4538-a105-81389c1c3521/

DLNG

Dynagas LNG Partners LP
Chart
$3.73
Latest Week 2026-06-05
EnergyOil & Gas MidstreamMICRO
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.93
OS Score
98.0%
Value
93.0%
Quality
29.0%
Momentum
#45.00000000
TV Rank
7/9
F-Score
0.955
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
13 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.930
↗
Trending Value
#45.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.955
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.9
💎
Deep Value
P/E 2.1
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 2.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
83.9%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
53.3%
💰
High Yield
Div 53.3%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 98th
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 22%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
98.0%ile
P/E
2.1×
P/S
0.9×
P/B
0.3×
E/P
0.4827
FCF Yield
1.124
EBITDA/EV
0.839
SH Yield
0.533
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
2.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
2.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
2.00000000
/100
P/E of 2.1x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 112.4% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 2.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
93.0%ile
ROE
0.135
ROA
0.083
Net Margin
0.416
Op Margin
0.469
GPA
0.103
D/E
0.63
Current
0.67
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.000
Earn Growth
0.226
Stability
0.166
lower=better
Accruals
-0.043
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
29.0%ile
6M Return
2.1%
12M Return
6.6%
12-1 Mom
8.3%
Risk-Adj
0.38
Vol 252d
22.0%
Vol 60d
53.3%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-11.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (53%) is expanding vs long-term (22%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.93
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Energy · 226 peers
Sector Value %ile
100.0%
Sector Quality %ile
88.1%
P/E z-score
-0.97
P/B z-score
-0.08
Sector Avg OS
71.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. 99.0% 96.0% 95.0% 97.0%
PBR-A Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras 99.0% 96.0% 93.0% 88.0%
APA APA Corporation 99.0% 95.0% 96.0% 92.0%
PBR Petroleo Brasileiro Petrobras SA ADR 99.0% 95.0% 93.0% 89.0%
TRMD Torm PLC Class A 98.0% 94.0% 82.0% 91.0%
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd 98.0% 87.0% 91.0% 92.0%
SD SandRidge Energy Inc 98.0% 95.0% 92.0% 83.0%
CVE Cenovus Energy Inc 98.0% 92.0% 80.0% 94.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (98th) and quality (93th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 53.3% backed by 112.4% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (53%) significantly exceeds 252-day (22%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
99.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
58.6% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
D
40.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
79.9% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.930—1—
Value %ile0.980—1—
Quality %ile0.930—1—
Momentum %ile0.290—1—
F-Score7.000—1—
Confidence0.970—1—
Volatility0.220—0—
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
2.07
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.4827
Price / Sales
0.86
Price / Book
0.28
Price / Cash Flow
1.36
FCF Yield
112.4%
EBITDA / EV
83.9%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.2458
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
53.3%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
13.5%
Return on Assets
8.3%
Net Margin
41.6%
Operating Margin
46.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
10.3%
Debt / Equity
0.63
Current Ratio
0.67
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.043
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
2.1%
12M Return
6.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
8.3%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.38
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-0.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
22.6%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.166
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
53.3%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
2
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
2
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
2
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
45
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity