Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/79442798-2041-4fba-949f-269998153738/

SMID

Smith-Midland Corp
Chart
29.97 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-10
Basic MaterialsBuilding MaterialsMICRO
Snapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.9w · Fresh
0.84
OS Score
82.0%
Value
89.0%
Quality
21.0%
Momentum
7/9
F-Score
0.854
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
7 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.840
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.854
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
11.9%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 19%
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +15%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 82%
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
82.0%ile
P/E
15.1×
P/S
1.7×
P/B
2.9×
E/P
0.0966
FCF Yield
0.170
EBITDA/EV
0.119
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
28.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
35.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
35.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 17.0% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
89.0%ile
ROE
0.189
ROA
0.114
Net Margin
0.114
Op Margin
0.157
GPA
0.253
D/E
0.66
Current
3.11
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.150
Earn Growth
0.327
Stability
0.441
lower=better
Accruals
-0.051
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
21.0%ile
6M Return
-15.2%
12M Return
-21.7%
12-1 Mom
-18.1%
Risk-Adj
-0.33
Vol 252d
55.5%
Vol 60d
130.5%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-39.2%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -18% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (131%) is expanding vs long-term (56%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.84
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials · 223 peers
Sector Value %ile
78.6%
Sector Quality %ile
85.7%
P/E z-score
-0.27
P/B z-score
-0.12
Sector Avg OS
53.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
B Barrick Mining Corporation 99.0% 90.0% 98.0% 85.0%
CGAU Centerra Gold Inc 99.0% 95.0% 82.0% 92.0%
IAG IAMGold Corporation 99.0% 93.0% 97.0% 91.0%
NEXA Nexa Resources SA 99.0% 95.0% 86.0% 96.0%
ARIS Aris Mining Corporation 98.0% 88.0% 93.0% 91.0%
BHP BHP Group Limited 98.0% 90.0% 98.0% 83.0%
GFI Gold Fields Ltd ADR 98.0% 92.0% 99.0% 78.0%
RIO Rio Tinto ADR 98.0% 94.0% 86.0% 82.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (82th) and quality (89th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (131%) significantly exceeds 252-day (56%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
67.3% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
67.4% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
13.5% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
24.1% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.840—6—
Value %ile0.820—6—
Quality %ile0.890—6—
Momentum %ile0.210—6—
F-Score7.000—6—
Confidence0.951—6—
Volatility0.555—6—
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
15.12
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0966
Price / Sales
1.72
Price / Book
2.86
Price / Cash Flow
10.45
FCF Yield
17.0%
EBITDA / EV
11.9%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.6147
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
18.9%
Return on Assets
11.4%
Net Margin
11.4%
Operating Margin
15.7%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
25.3%
Debt / Equity
0.66
Current Ratio
3.11
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.051
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-15.2%
12M Return
-21.7%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-18.1%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.33
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
15.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
32.7%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.441
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
28
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
35
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
35
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity