Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/7e7c1ac8-9128-444f-8178-d6cc8a581b67/
NRDS
Nerdwallet IncSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
7 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.890
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.965
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 8.0
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
27.5%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +16%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 95th
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
95.0%ile
P/E
8.0×
P/S
0.7×
P/B
1.6×
E/P
0.1244
FCF Yield
0.311
EBITDA/EV
0.275
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
5.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
13.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
13.00000000
/100
P/E of 8.0x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 31.1% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
98.0%ile
ROE
0.205
ROA
0.159
Net Margin
0.081
Op Margin
0.113
GPA
1.830
D/E
0.28
Current
2.57
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.156
Earn Growth
1.336
Stability
1.281
lower=better
Accruals
-0.166
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 20% is exceptional. Conservative balance sheet with D/E of 0.28. F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
10.0%ile
6M Return
-48.3%
12M Return
-28.5%
12-1 Mom
-18.1%
Risk-Adj
-0.36
Vol 252d
49.9%
Vol 60d
115.9%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-49.6%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -18% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (116%) is expanding vs long-term (50%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.89
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Communication Services
· 264 peers
Sector Value %ile
90.2%
Sector Quality %ile
99.6%
P/E z-score
-0.42
P/B z-score
-0.08
Sector Avg OS
54.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (95th) and quality (98th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (95th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 16% with P/E of 8×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (10th) despite looking cheap (95th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (116%) significantly exceeds 252-day (50%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
81.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
75.5% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
6.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
33.6% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.890 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.950 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.980 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.100 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 8.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 1.000 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.499 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
8.04
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1244
Price / Sales
0.65
Price / Book
1.65
Price / Cash Flow
3.94
FCF Yield
31.1%
EBITDA / EV
27.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.6777
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
20.5%
Return on Assets
15.9%
Net Margin
8.1%
Operating Margin
11.3%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
183.0%
Debt / Equity
0.28
Current Ratio
2.57
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.166
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-48.3%
12M Return
-28.5%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-18.1%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.36
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
15.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
133.6%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.281
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
5
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
13
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
13
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity