Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/8ca44662-e234-4e04-9177-67db65f504b0/
VINP
Vinci Partners Investments LtdSnapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.9w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
14 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.980
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.944
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.4
💎
Deep Value
P/E 1.5
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 1
📐
EBITDA/EV
40.6%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 22%
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +118%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
14.2%
💰
High Yield
Div 6.4%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 98%
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 24%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.81
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
98.0%ile
P/E
1.5×
P/S
0.4×
P/B
0.3×
E/P
0.3699
FCF Yield
0.157
EBITDA/EV
0.406
SH Yield
0.142
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
2.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
1.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
2.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.5x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 15.7% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 1.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
91.0%ile
ROE
0.221
ROA
0.114
Net Margin
0.270
Op Margin
0.377
GPA
0.336
D/E
0.90
Current
5.08
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
1.185
Earn Growth
2.463
Stability
0.701
lower=better
Accruals
0.056
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 22% is exceptional. F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
70.0%ile
6M Return
-21.8%
12M Return
12.6%
12-1 Mom
9.8%
Risk-Adj
0.40
Vol 252d
24.4%
Vol 60d
57.5%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-24.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (58%) is expanding vs long-term (24%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.98
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
98.4%
Sector Quality %ile
90.4%
P/E z-score
-0.53
P/B z-score
-0.15
Sector Avg OS
85.7%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (98th) and quality (91th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (98th value) with strong momentum (70th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (98th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 118% with P/E of 1×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 14.2% backed by 15.7% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (58%) significantly exceeds 252-day (24%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
99.9% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
75.3% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
D
34.8% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
76.0% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.980 | —6 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.980 | —6 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.910 | —6 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.700 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 8.000 | —6 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.980 | —6 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.244 | —0 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.48
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.3699
Price / Sales
0.40
Price / Book
0.33
Price / Cash Flow
2.89
FCF Yield
15.7%
EBITDA / EV
40.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.9821
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
14.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
22.1%
Return on Assets
11.4%
Net Margin
27.0%
Operating Margin
37.7%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
33.6%
Debt / Equity
0.90
Current Ratio
5.08
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.056
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.013
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-21.8%
12M Return
12.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
9.8%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.40
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
118.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
246.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.701
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
6.4%
Buyback Yield
7.8%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
2
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
1
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
2
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
76
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity