Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/a946a87a-206a-4ad8-a41f-f595fba976e4/

TKC

Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS
Chart
$5.77
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.88
OS Score
99.0%
Value
73.0%
Quality
23.0%
Momentum
#46.00000000
TV Rank
7/9
F-Score
0.850
QV
Strategy Eligibility
8 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.880
Trending Value
#46.00000000
Quality × Value
QV 0.850
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
P/E 0.4
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 1.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
84.5%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
200.7%
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
99.0%ile
P/E
0.4×
P/S
0.0×
P/B
0.0×
E/P
2.8539
FCF Yield
0.797
EBITDA/EV
0.845
SH Yield
2.007
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
1.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
1.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
1.00000000
/100
P/E of 0.4x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 79.7% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 1.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
73.0%ile
ROE
0.049
ROA
0.023
Net Margin
0.078
Op Margin
0.197
GPA
0.082
D/E
1.12
Current
1.69
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.025
Earn Growth
-0.409
Stability
0.858
lower=better
Accruals
-0.063
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
23.0%ile
6M Return
1.0%
12M Return
-6.1%
12-1 Mom
8.0%
Risk-Adj
0.26
Vol 252d
31.4%
Vol 60d
69.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-18.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (70%) is expanding vs long-term (31%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.88
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Communication Services · 264 peers
Sector Value %ile
100.0%
Sector Quality %ile
73.2%
P/E z-score
-0.55
P/B z-score
-0.09
Sector Avg OS
54.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
AMX America Movil SAB de CV ADR 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 86.0%
TIMB TIM Participacoes SA 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 79.0%
BODI The Beachbody Company, Inc. 99.0% 92.0% 91.0% 97.0%
AMCX AMC Networks Inc 98.0% 98.0% 77.0% 83.0%
VIV Telefonica Brasil SA ADR 98.0% 98.0% 91.0% 81.0%
TIGO Millicom International Cellular SA 97.0% 81.0% 98.0% 95.0%
RCI Rogers Communications Inc 97.0% 96.0% 71.0% 84.0%
TV Grupo Televisa SAB ADR 96.0% 97.0% 71.0% 80.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (99th) and quality (73th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 200.7% backed by 79.7% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (70%) significantly exceeds 252-day (31%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
100.0% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
45.0% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
D
35.2% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
64.4% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.880—1
Value %ile0.990—1
Quality %ile0.730—1
Momentum %ile0.230—1
F-Score7.000—1
Confidence1.000—1
Volatility0.314—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
0.35
Earnings Yield (E/P)
2.8539
Price / Sales
0.03
Price / Book
0.02
Price / Cash Flow
0.09
FCF Yield
79.7%
EBITDA / EV
84.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.7716
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
200.7%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
4.9%
Return on Assets
2.3%
Net Margin
7.8%
Operating Margin
19.7%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
8.2%
Debt / Equity
1.12
Current Ratio
1.69
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.063
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
1.0%
12M Return
-6.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
8.0%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.26
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-2.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-40.9%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.858
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
1
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
1
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
1
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
46
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity