Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/a946a87a-206a-4ad8-a41f-f595fba976e4/

TKC

Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS
Chart
5.72 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-17
Snapshot 2026-07-19 · 0.6w · Fresh
0.89
OS Score
99.0%
Value
71.0%
Quality
28.0%
Momentum
#56.00000000
TV Rank
7/9
F-Score
0.838
QV
Strategy Eligibility
7 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.890
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.838
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
P/E 0.3
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 3
📐
EBITDA/EV
75.2%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 1.00
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
99.0%ile
P/E
0.3×
P/S
0.0×
P/B
0.0×
E/P
0.3100
FCF Yield
0.709
EBITDA/EV
0.752
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
1.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
3.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
3.00000000
/100
P/E of 0.3x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 70.9% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 3.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
71.0%ile
ROE
0.049
ROA
0.023
Net Margin
0.078
Op Margin
0.197
GPA
0.082
D/E
1.12
Current
1.69
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.025
Earn Growth
-0.409
Stability
0.858
lower=better
Accruals
-0.063
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
28.0%ile
6M Return
-6.1%
12M Return
1.0%
12-1 Mom
7.9%
Risk-Adj
0.27
Vol 252d
29.4%
Vol 60d
65.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-18.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (65%) is expanding vs long-term (29%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.89
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Communication Services · 244 peers
Sector Value %ile
100.0%
Sector Quality %ile
69.4%
P/E z-score
-0.53
P/B z-score
-0.19
Sector Avg OS
51.3%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
TIMB TIM Participacoes SA 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 76.0%
AMX America Movil SAB de CV ADR 99.0% 98.0% 97.0% 86.0%
BODI The Beachbody Company, Inc. 98.0% 94.0% 79.0% 96.0%
AMCX AMC Networks Inc 98.0% 97.0% 78.0% 88.0%
VIV Telefonica Brasil SA ADR 98.0% 98.0% 89.0% 76.0%
DDI Doubledown Interactive Co Ltd 97.0% 97.0% 92.0% 65.0%
TBLA Taboola 97.0% 90.0% 88.0% 82.0%
TIGO Millicom International Cellular SA 97.0% 76.0% 97.0% 96.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (99th) and quality (71th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (65%) significantly exceeds 252-day (29%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
87.3% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
45.0% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
D
35.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
67.7% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends7 snapshots
Factor Persistence7 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.890—7
Value %ile0.990—7
Quality %ile0.710—7
Momentum %ile0.280—3
F-Score7.000—7
Confidence0.940—7
Volatility0.294—0
Value Lens2021-07-20 → 2026-07-19
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
0.35
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.3100
Price / Sales
0.03
Price / Book
0.02
Price / Cash Flow
0.09
FCF Yield
70.9%
EBITDA / EV
75.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.5767
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
4.9%
Return on Assets
2.3%
Net Margin
7.8%
Operating Margin
19.7%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
8.2%
Debt / Equity
1.12
Current Ratio
1.69
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.063
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-6.1%
12M Return
1.0%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
7.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.27
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-2.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-40.9%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.858
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
1
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
3
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
3
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
56
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity