Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/acc31f97-14c9-48d9-a5fe-cd366ebae963/
BWLP
BW LPG LimitedSnapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.9w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
11 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.960
↗
Trending Value
#3
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.821
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 5
📐
EBITDA/EV
20.2%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 19%
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
6.4%
💰
High Yield
Div 6.3%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 87%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 1.00
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.78
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
95.0%ile
P/E
8.2×
P/S
0.8×
P/B
1.6×
E/P
0.1340
FCF Yield
0.181
EBITDA/EV
0.202
SH Yield
0.064
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
6.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
5.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
5.00000000
/100
P/E of 8.2x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 18.1% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 5.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
71.0%ile
ROE
0.190
ROA
0.108
Net Margin
0.101
Op Margin
0.139
GPA
0.208
D/E
0.69
Current
1.47
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.050
Earn Growth
0.385
Stability
0.582
lower=better
Accruals
-0.059
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
84.0%ile
6M Return
61.8%
12M Return
70.4%
12-1 Mom
86.5%
Risk-Adj
1.78
Vol 252d
48.6%
Vol 60d
107.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-23.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 87% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 1.78 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (108%) is expanding vs long-term (49%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.96
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Energy
· 226 peers
Sector Value %ile
91.6%
Sector Quality %ile
63.4%
P/E z-score
-0.61
P/B z-score
-0.07
Sector Avg OS
69.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (95th) and quality (71th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (95th value) with strong momentum (84th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 6.4% backed by 18.1% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (84th) but high volatility (49%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (108%) significantly exceeds 252-day (49%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
92.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
57.4% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
A
92.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
35.6% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.960 | —6 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.950 | —6 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.710 | —6 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.840 | —6 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.980 | —6 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.486 | —6 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
8.24
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1340
Price / Sales
0.83
Price / Book
1.56
Price / Cash Flow
5.34
FCF Yield
18.1%
EBITDA / EV
20.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.9624
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
6.4%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
19.0%
Return on Assets
10.8%
Net Margin
10.1%
Operating Margin
13.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
20.8%
Debt / Equity
0.69
Current Ratio
1.47
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.059
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.001
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
61.8%
12M Return
70.4%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
86.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.78
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
5.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
38.5%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.582
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
6.3%
Buyback Yield
0.1%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
6
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
5
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
5
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
3
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity