Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/be1527d9-98a5-4403-b4c6-494400f8b5c2/

EG

Everest Group Ltd
Chart
$334.41
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.88
OS Score
97.0%
Value
73.0%
Quality
24.0%
Momentum
#36.00000000
TV Rank
6/9
F-Score
0.841
QV
Strategy Eligibility
8 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.880
Trending Value
#36.00000000
Quality × Value
QV 0.841
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
P/E 6.6
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 4.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
16.1%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
2.4%
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 22%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
97.0%ile
P/E
6.6×
P/S
0.8×
P/B
0.9×
E/P
0.1510
FCF Yield
0.374
EBITDA/EV
0.161
SH Yield
0.024
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
4.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
4.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
4.00000000
/100
P/E of 6.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 37.4% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 4.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
73.0%ile
ROE
0.133
ROA
0.033
Net Margin
0.119
Op Margin
0.145
GPA
0.078
D/E
3.08
Current
0.73
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.005
Earn Growth
1.393
Stability
1.192
lower=better
Accruals
-0.013
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Highly leveraged with D/E of 3.08 — returns are being amplified by debt.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
24.0%ile
6M Return
8.6%
12M Return
-1.6%
12-1 Mom
3.4%
Risk-Adj
0.16
Vol 252d
21.6%
Vol 60d
53.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-12.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (53%) is expanding vs long-term (22%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.88
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Financial Services · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
97.4%
Sector Quality %ile
44.1%
P/E z-score
-0.35
P/B z-score
-0.07
Sector Avg OS
86.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
CARE Carter Bank and Trust 99.0% 96.0% 98.0% 88.0%
HG Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. 99.0% 97.0% 94.0% 85.0%
MCY Mercury General Corporation 99.0% 95.0% 93.0% 86.0%
BAP Credicorp Ltd 99.0% 98.0% 93.0% 84.0%
BFH Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. 99.0% 97.0% 97.0% 90.0%
UVE Universal Insurance Holdings Inc 99.0% 96.0% 94.0% 82.0%
SYF Synchrony Financial 98.0% 96.0% 97.0% 72.0%
RNR Renaissancere Holdings Ltd 98.0% 97.0% 96.0% 70.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (97th) and quality (73th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (53%) significantly exceeds 252-day (22%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
86.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
34.9% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
D
36.6% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
80.7% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.880—1
Value %ile0.970—1
Quality %ile0.730—1
Momentum %ile0.240—1
F-Score6.000—0
Confidence1.000—1
Volatility0.216—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
6.62
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1510
Price / Sales
0.79
Price / Book
0.88
Price / Cash Flow
4.72
FCF Yield
37.4%
EBITDA / EV
16.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.0960
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
2.4%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
13.3%
Return on Assets
3.3%
Net Margin
11.9%
Operating Margin
14.5%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
7.8%
Debt / Equity
3.08
Current Ratio
0.73
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.013
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
8.6%
12M Return
-1.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
3.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.16
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-0.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
139.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.192
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
2.4%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
4
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
4
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
4
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
36
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity