Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/f110188b-b794-4fa9-a826-af5525d9dce6/

TAH

Tabcorp Holdings Limited
Chart
0.88 AUD
Latest Week 2026-07-17
Snapshot 2026-07-19 · 0.7w · Fresh
0.95
OS Score
88.0%
Value
81.0%
Quality
86.0%
Momentum
4/9
F-Score
0.844
QV
Strategy Eligibility
4 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.950
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.844
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
14.0%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
3.1%
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
88.0%ile
P/E
54.8×
P/S
0.8×
P/B
1.6×
E/P
0.0583
FCF Yield
0.110
EBITDA/EV
0.140
SH Yield
0.031
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
15.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
15.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
11.00000000
/100
P/E of 54.8x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. FCF yield of 11.0% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
81.0%ile
ROE
0.029
ROA
0.012
Net Margin
0.014
Op Margin
0.059
GPA
0.833
Current
0.53
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.118
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
86.0%ile
6M Return
-9.9%
12M Return
12.1%
12-1 Mom
12.1%
Risk-Adj
0.18
Vol 252d
66.9%
Vol 60d
133.7%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-42.1%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (134%) is expanding vs long-term (67%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.95
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Consumer Cyclical · 90 peers
Sector Value %ile
63.7%
Sector Quality %ile
63.7%
P/E z-score
1.10
P/B z-score
-0.12
Sector Avg OS
53.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
SHM Shriro Holdings Limited 99.0% 98.0% 96.0% 88.0%
JYC Joyce Corporation Ltd 98.0% 90.0% 96.0% 93.0%
CCV Cash Converters International Limited 98.0% 98.0% 94.0% 83.0%
VVA Viva Leisure Limited 96.0% 91.0% 86.0% 88.0%
TWD Tamawood Limited 94.0% 84.0% 83.0% 84.0%
APE Eagers Automotive Limited 94.0% 83.0% 85.0% 88.0%
HLO Helloworld Travel Limited 94.0% 85.0% 83.0% 85.0%
HT8 Harris Technology Group Limited 91.0% 80.0% 78.0% 79.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (88th) and quality (81th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (88th value) with strong momentum (86th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (86th) but high volatility (67%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (134%) significantly exceeds 252-day (67%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
61.3% avg (7 factors)
Quality
F
27.9% avg (6 factors)
Momentum
D
37.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
5.1% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends7 snapshots
Factor Persistence7 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.950—7
Value %ile0.880—7
Quality %ile0.810—1
Momentum %ile0.860—7
F-Score4.000—7
Confidence0.444—0
Volatility0.669—7
Value Lens2021-07-20 → 2026-07-19
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
54.81
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0583
Price / Sales
0.77
Price / Book
1.60
FCF Yield
11.0%
EBITDA / EV
14.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.9933
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
3.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
2.9%
Return on Assets
1.2%
Net Margin
1.4%
Operating Margin
5.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
83.3%
Current Ratio
0.53
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-9.9%
12M Return
12.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
12.1%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.18
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
11.8%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
2.9%
Buyback Yield
0.2%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
15
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
15
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
11
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity