Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/f2e3255e-35ca-4483-881a-12de6380521f/

VEIL

Vietnam Enterprise Ord
Chart
774.00 GBp
Latest Week 2026-07-10
Financial ServicesAsset ManagementSMALL
Snapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.7w · Fresh
0.94
OS Score
90.0%
Value
74.0%
Quality
80.0%
Momentum
#50.00000000
TV Rank
5/9
F-Score
0.816
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
9 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.940
↗
Trending Value
#50
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.816
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 6
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +104%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
19.7%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 90%
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 19%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.61
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
90.0%ile
P/E
2.9×
P/S
2.9×
P/B
0.5×
FCF Yield
0.256
SH Yield
0.197
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
12.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
6.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
7.00000000
/100
P/E of 2.9x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 25.6% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 6.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
74.0%ile
ROE
0.186
ROA
0.183
Net Margin
0.979
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
1.036
Earn Growth
1.365
Accruals
0.053
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
80.0%ile
6M Return
-6.1%
12M Return
17.8%
12-1 Mom
14.6%
Risk-Adj
0.77
Vol 252d
19.0%
Vol 60d
44.3%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-16.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (44%) is expanding vs long-term (19%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.94
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services · 185 peers
Sector Value %ile
94.6%
Sector Quality %ile
73.7%
P/E z-score
-0.50
P/B z-score
-0.51
Sector Avg OS
55.3%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
CRE Conduit Holdings Limited 98.0% 98.0% 84.0% 82.0%
BGEO Lion Finance Group PLC 97.0% 93.0% 71.0% 94.0%
JUP Jupiter Fund Management Plc 97.0% 90.0% 86.0% 89.0%
BEZ Beazley plc 97.0% 88.0% 88.0% 90.0%
LRE Lancashire Holdings Limited 96.0% 96.0% 80.0% 75.0%
STAN Standard Chartered PLC 96.0% 89.0% 78.0% 94.0%
PEEL Peel Hunt Limited 96.0% 96.0% 84.0% 74.0%
CLIG City of London Investment Group Plc 96.0% 83.0% 96.0% 87.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (90th) and quality (74th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (90th value) with strong momentum (80th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 104% with P/E of 3×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 19.7% backed by 25.6% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (44%) significantly exceeds 252-day (19%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
96.4% avg (5 factors)
Quality
B
70.8% avg (4 factors)
Momentum
C
45.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
84.9% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.940—6—
Value %ile0.900—6—
Quality %ile0.740—6—
Momentum %ile0.800—1—
F-Score5.000—0—
Confidence0.560—0—
Volatility0.190—1—
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
2.94
Price / Sales
2.88
Price / Book
0.55
Price / Cash Flow
4.15
FCF Yield
25.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.3690
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
19.7%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
18.6%
Return on Assets
18.3%
Net Margin
97.9%
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.053
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-6.1%
12M Return
17.8%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
14.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.77
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
103.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
136.5%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Buyback Yield
19.7%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
12
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
6
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
7
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
50
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity