Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/f962b5c9-e8db-49a5-80d4-c64e0a52a043/

IPH

IPH Limited
Chart
3.99 AUD
Latest Week 2026-07-10
IndustrialsSpecialty Business ServicesSMALL
Snapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.6w · Fresh
0.84
OS Score
93.0%
Value
96.0%
Quality
11.0%
Momentum
#9.00000000
TV Rank
4/9
F-Score
0.945
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
8 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.840
↗
Trending Value
#9
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.945
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 9
📐
EBITDA/EV
13.1%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +17%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
5.0%
💰
High Yield
Div 9.6%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
93.0%ile
P/E
14.9×
P/S
1.4×
P/B
1.5×
E/P
0.0929
FCF Yield
0.088
EBITDA/EV
0.131
SH Yield
0.050
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
10.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
9.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
9.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 8.8% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 9.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
96.0%ile
ROE
0.098
ROA
0.051
Net Margin
0.097
Op Margin
0.188
GPA
0.523
Current
2.72
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.166
Earn Growth
0.076
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
11.0%ile
6M Return
14.5%
12M Return
-13.7%
12-1 Mom
-8.3%
Risk-Adj
-0.25
Vol 252d
33.9%
Vol 60d
63.1%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-38.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (63%) is expanding vs long-term (34%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.84
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials · 129 peers
Sector Value %ile
88.5%
Sector Quality %ile
98.5%
P/E z-score
-0.35
P/B z-score
-0.22
Sector Avg OS
53.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
EHL Emeco Holdings Limited 99.0% 99.0% 93.0% 87.0%
ASH Ashley Services Group Limited 99.0% 96.0% 91.0% 95.0%
BOL Boom Logistics Limited 99.0% 99.0% 94.0% 95.0%
AHL Adrad Holdings Limited 97.0% 95.0% 81.0% 97.0%
LBL LaserBond Limited 97.0% 91.0% 88.0% 93.0%
WWG Wiseway Group Limited 97.0% 93.0% 84.0% 97.0%
IPG IPD Group Limited 97.0% 86.0% 93.0% 94.0%
SYL Symal Group Limited 97.0% 88.0% 88.0% 95.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (93th) and quality (96th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 17% with P/E of 15×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (11th) despite looking cheap (93th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 5.0% backed by 8.8% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (63%) significantly exceeds 252-day (34%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
75.4% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
59.9% avg (6 factors)
Momentum
F
28.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
60.1% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.840—6—
Value %ile0.930—6—
Quality %ile0.960—6—
Momentum %ile0.110—6—
F-Score4.000—6—
Confidence0.470—0—
Volatility0.339—0—
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
14.86
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0929
Price / Sales
1.45
Price / Book
1.46
FCF Yield
8.8%
EBITDA / EV
13.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.4927
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
5.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
9.8%
Return on Assets
5.1%
Net Margin
9.7%
Operating Margin
18.8%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
52.3%
Current Ratio
2.72
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.145
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
14.5%
12M Return
-13.7%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-8.3%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.25
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
16.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
7.6%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
9.6%
Buyback Yield
-4.7%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
10
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
9
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
9
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
9
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity