Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/02a20d35-0600-437a-a291-755b3d02b17e/

PXED

Phoenix Education Partners, Inc.
Chart
$30.33
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.89
OS Score
72.0%
Value
89.0%
Quality
64.0%
Momentum
4/9
F-Score
0.800
QV
Strategy Eligibility
5 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.890
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.800
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
12.0%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
18.2%
💰
High Yield
Div 18.2%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
72.0%ile
P/E
19.7×
P/S
1.2×
P/B
4.1×
E/P
0.0507
FCF Yield
0.174
EBITDA/EV
0.120
SH Yield
0.182
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
28.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
19.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
18.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 17.4% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
89.0%ile
ROE
0.206
ROA
0.110
Net Margin
0.062
Op Margin
0.095
GPA
0.965
D/E
0.87
Current
2.01
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.000
Earn Growth
-0.472
Stability
0.688
lower=better
Accruals
-0.156
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 21% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
64.0%ile
6M Return
-8.4%
Vol 252d
46.3%
Vol 60d
102.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-29.1%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (102%) is expanding vs long-term (46%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.89
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Consumer Defensive · 236 peers
Sector Value %ile
63.7%
Sector Quality %ile
91.6%
P/E z-score
-0.20
P/B z-score
-0.08
Sector Avg OS
49.9%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ABEV Ambev SA ADR 99.0% 98.0% 97.0% 80.0%
VFF Village Farms International Inc 98.0% 97.0% 78.0% 91.0%
SENEB Seneca Foods Corp B 97.0% 94.0% 73.0% 86.0%
HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd 97.0% 95.0% 72.0% 86.0%
SENEA Seneca Foods Corp A 96.0% 94.0% 74.0% 84.0%
DDL Dingdong (Cayman) Limited ADR 96.0% 99.0% 73.0% 71.0%
NATR Natures Sunshine Products Inc 95.0% 81.0% 86.0% 82.0%
JBS JBS N.V. 95.0% 98.0% 72.0% 65.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (72th) and quality (89th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 18.2% backed by 17.4% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (102%) significantly exceeds 252-day (46%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
72.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
66.4% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
27.0% avg (1 factors)
Risk
D
39.4% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.890—1
Value %ile0.720—1
Quality %ile0.890—1
Momentum %ile0.640—0
F-Score4.000—1
Confidence0.926—1
Volatility0.463—1
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
19.71
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0507
Price / Sales
1.22
Price / Book
4.05
Price / Cash Flow
8.12
FCF Yield
17.4%
EBITDA / EV
12.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.0080
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
18.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
20.6%
Return on Assets
11.0%
Net Margin
6.2%
Operating Margin
9.5%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
96.5%
Debt / Equity
0.87
Current Ratio
2.01
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.156
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-8.4%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-0.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-47.2%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.688
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
18.2%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
28
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
19
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
18
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity