Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/11c349da-11b7-4b73-bfbd-304aee82449b/

KLAC

KLA Corporation
Chart
$1,929.20
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.5
OS Score
1.0%
Value
96.0%
Quality
94.0%
Momentum
9/9
F-Score
0.098
QV
Strategy Eligibility
3 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 133%
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 3.28
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
1.0%ile
P/E
54.4×
P/S
19.4×
P/B
43.6×
E/P
0.0184
FCF Yield
0.019
EBITDA/EV
0.023
SH Yield
0.004
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
99.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
98.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
98.00000000
/100
P/E of 54.4x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. VC2 score of 98.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
96.0%ile
ROE
0.801
ROA
0.277
Net Margin
0.357
Op Margin
0.421
GPA
0.479
D/E
1.89
Current
3.03
F-Score
9/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.134
Earn Growth
0.264
Stability
0.149
lower=better
Accruals
0.016
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 80% is exceptional. F-Score of 9/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
94.0%ile
6M Return
59.3%
12M Return
140.3%
12-1 Mom
132.5%
Risk-Adj
3.28
Vol 252d
40.4%
Vol 60d
98.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-14.1%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 133% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 3.28 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (99%) is expanding vs long-term (40%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.5
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
6.6%
Sector Quality %ile
95.2%
P/E z-score
-0.03
P/B z-score
0.26
Sector Avg OS
53.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
JFU 9F Inc 99.0% 98.0% 82.0% 93.0%
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 99.0% 89.0% 97.0%
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 99.0% 98.0% 92.0% 84.0%
UMC United Microelectronics 99.0% 99.0% 82.0% 95.0%
DSWL Deswell Industries Inc 98.0% 98.0% 80.0% 85.0%
TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd Ordinary Shares 98.0% 83.0% 97.0% 98.0%
PLAB Photronics Inc 98.0% 94.0% 87.0% 90.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 97.0% 86.0% 98.0% 83.0%
Factor Interactions
Quality Momentum — Expensive
Strong quality (96th) and momentum (94th) but expensive (1th value). Premium priced — watch for mean reversion.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (94th) but high volatility (40%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (96th) but expensive (1th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (99%) significantly exceeds 252-day (40%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
9.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
87.8% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
A
100.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
49.3% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.500—0
Value %ile0.010—1
Quality %ile0.960—1
Momentum %ile0.940—1
F-Score9.000—1
Confidence1.000—1
Volatility0.404—1
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
54.42
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0184
Price / Sales
19.41
Price / Book
43.59
Price / Cash Flow
57.74
FCF Yield
1.9%
EBITDA / EV
2.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.0507
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.4%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
80.1%
Return on Assets
27.7%
Net Margin
35.7%
Operating Margin
42.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
47.9%
Debt / Equity
1.89
Current Ratio
3.03
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.016
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
59.3%
12M Return
140.3%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
132.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
3.28
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
13.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
26.4%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.149
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
9
Dividend Yield
0.4%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
99
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
98
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
98
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity