Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/bee51964-f246-40e1-b684-5de2cce20264/

KARO

Karooooo Ltd
Chart
$47.12
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.91
OS Score
99.0%
Value
97.0%
Quality
14.0%
Momentum
#50.00000000
TV Rank
5/9
F-Score
0.980
QV
Strategy Eligibility
10 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.910
Trending Value
#50.00000000
Quality × Value
QV 0.980
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.3
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 4.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
112.1%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 30%
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
Rev +20%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 99th
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
99.0%ile
P/E
1.5×
P/S
0.3×
P/B
0.4×
E/P
0.6828
FCF Yield
3.043
EBITDA/EV
1.121
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
2.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
4.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
4.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.5x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 304.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 4.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
97.0%ile
ROE
0.300
ROA
0.170
Net Margin
0.181
Op Margin
0.259
GPA
0.637
D/E
0.75
Current
1.06
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.200
Earn Growth
0.079
Stability
0.083
lower=better
Accruals
-0.164
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 30% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
14.0%ile
6M Return
-0.0%
12M Return
-17.1%
12-1 Mom
-11.7%
Risk-Adj
-0.37
Vol 252d
31.8%
Vol 60d
71.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-24.7%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -12% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (71%) is expanding vs long-term (32%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.91
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
100.0%
Sector Quality %ile
96.4%
P/E z-score
-0.21
P/B z-score
-0.12
Sector Avg OS
53.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 99.0% 89.0% 97.0%
UMC United Microelectronics 99.0% 99.0% 82.0% 95.0%
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 99.0% 98.0% 92.0% 84.0%
JFU 9F Inc 99.0% 98.0% 82.0% 93.0%
PLAB Photronics Inc 98.0% 94.0% 87.0% 90.0%
TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd Ordinary Shares 98.0% 83.0% 97.0% 98.0%
DSWL Deswell Industries Inc 98.0% 98.0% 80.0% 85.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 97.0% 86.0% 98.0% 83.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (99th) and quality (97th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 20% with P/E of 1×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (14th) despite looking cheap (99th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (71%) significantly exceeds 252-day (32%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
87.3% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
79.9% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
21.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
63.7% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.910—1
Value %ile0.990—1
Quality %ile0.970—1
Momentum %ile0.140—1
F-Score5.000—0
Confidence0.986—1
Volatility0.318—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.46
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.6828
Price / Sales
0.27
Price / Book
0.44
Price / Cash Flow
0.75
FCF Yield
304.3%
EBITDA / EV
112.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
4.2727
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
30.0%
Return on Assets
17.0%
Net Margin
18.1%
Operating Margin
25.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
63.7%
Debt / Equity
0.75
Current Ratio
1.06
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.164
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-0.0%
12M Return
-17.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-11.7%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.37
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
20.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
7.9%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.083
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
2
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
4
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
4
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
50
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity