Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/bee51964-f246-40e1-b684-5de2cce20264/

KARO

Karooooo Ltd
Chart
62.69 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-17
Snapshot 2026-07-19 · 0.6w · Fresh
0.98
OS Score
98.0%
Value
98.0%
Quality
66.0%
Momentum
#9.00000000
TV Rank
5/9
F-Score
0.980
QV
Strategy Eligibility
13 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.980
Trending Value
#9
Quality × Value
QV 0.980
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.3
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 2
📐
EBITDA/EV
122.4%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 29%
📈
Consistent Earners
Yes
🌱
GARP
Rev +21%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
4.4%
💰
High Yield
Div 4.4%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 98%
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 1.00
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
98.0%ile
P/E
1.9×
P/S
0.3×
P/B
0.5×
E/P
0.7613
FCF Yield
1.879
EBITDA/EV
1.224
SH Yield
0.044
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
2.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
2.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
2.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.9x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 187.9% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 2.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
98.0%ile
ROE
0.286
ROA
0.163
Net Margin
0.178
Op Margin
0.258
GPA
0.623
D/E
0.74
Current
1.02
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.211
Earn Growth
0.063
Stability
0.105
lower=better
Accruals
-0.133
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 29% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
66.0%ile
6M Return
34.0%
12M Return
28.6%
12-1 Mom
-5.2%
Risk-Adj
-0.15
Vol 252d
34.7%
Vol 60d
69.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-24.7%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (70%) is expanding vs long-term (35%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.98
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
99.4%
Sector Quality %ile
98.4%
P/E z-score
-0.20
P/B z-score
-0.25
Sector Avg OS
50.7%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 98.0% 84.0% 98.0%
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 99.0% 99.0% 93.0% 80.0%
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 90.0%
TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd Ordinary Shares 99.0% 97.0% 97.0% 86.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 98.0% 86.0% 98.0% 90.0%
VISN CommScope Holding Company, Inc. 98.0% 95.0% 76.0% 98.0%
PLAB Photronics Inc 98.0% 95.0% 85.0% 86.0%
TDC Teradata Corp 97.0% 89.0% 95.0% 82.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (98th) and quality (98th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 21% with P/E of 2×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 4.4% backed by 187.9% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (70%) significantly exceeds 252-day (35%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
94.2% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
78.6% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
C
48.1% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
58.8% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends7 snapshots
Factor Persistence7 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.980—7
Value %ile0.980—7
Quality %ile0.980—7
Momentum %ile0.660—0
F-Score5.000—0
Confidence1.000—7
Volatility0.347—0
Value Lens2021-07-20 → 2026-07-19
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.89
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.7613
Price / Sales
0.34
Price / Book
0.54
Price / Cash Flow
1.04
FCF Yield
187.9%
EBITDA / EV
122.4%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
2.9562
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
4.4%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
28.6%
Return on Assets
16.3%
Net Margin
17.8%
Operating Margin
25.8%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
62.3%
Debt / Equity
0.74
Current Ratio
1.02
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.133
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
34.0%
12M Return
28.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-5.2%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.15
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
21.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
6.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.105
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
4.4%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
2
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
2
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
2
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
9
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity