Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/25fde5c9-969b-4b96-a675-d0381f58a1cb/
COAG
Hemab Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. Common StockSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
56.0%ile
FCF Yield
-0.058
SH Yield
-0.140
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
44.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
44.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
44.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-5.8%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
56.0%ile
ROE
0.322
ROA
-0.365
Current
12.85
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Accruals
-0.014
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 32% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
56.0%ile
Max DD 12M
-11.2%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.65
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Healthcare
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
51.7%
Sector Quality %ile
54.1%
Sector Avg OS
63.3%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
0.0% avg (2 factors)
Quality
B
64.4% avg (4 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.650 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.560 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.560 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.560 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.364 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | — | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
FCF Yield
-5.8%
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-14.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
32.2%
Return on Assets
-36.5%
Current Ratio
12.85
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.014
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-14.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
44
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
44
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
44
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity