Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/3e0c8344-25b3-47b7-ac91-ad536a1c0d9b/
KOTHARIPET
Kothari Petrochemicals LimitedSnapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.7w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
8 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.900
↗
Trending Value
#35
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.925
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 10.6
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 7
📐
EBITDA/EV
13.9%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Yes
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 1.00
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
94.0%ile
P/E
10.6×
P/S
1.3×
P/B
2.1×
E/P
0.1166
FCF Yield
0.106
EBITDA/EV
0.139
SH Yield
0.015
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
10.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
7.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
10.00000000
/100
P/E of 10.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 10.6% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 7.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
91.0%ile
ROE
0.195
ROA
0.164
Net Margin
0.123
Op Margin
0.150
GPA
0.420
Current
2.48
F-Score
6/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.024
Earn Growth
0.101
Stability
0.033
lower=better
Accruals
-0.018
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
15.0%ile
6M Return
9.2%
12M Return
-26.8%
12-1 Mom
-33.6%
Risk-Adj
-0.91
Vol 252d
36.9%
Vol 60d
83.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-43.5%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -34% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (83%) is expanding vs long-term (37%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.9
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 371 peers
Sector Value %ile
92.7%
Sector Quality %ile
93.8%
P/E z-score
-0.18
P/B z-score
-0.29
Sector Avg OS
54.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONALUM | 99.0% | 87.0% | 98.0% | 97.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 99.0% | 88.0% | 98.0% | 86.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 97.0% | 92.0% | 81.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% | 69.0% | |
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 90.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| NMDC | 98.0% | 88.0% | 84.0% | 86.0% | |
| ZUARI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 65.0% | 79.0% | |
| GANESHBE | 98.0% | 94.0% | 79.0% | 74.0% |
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (94th) and quality (91th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (15th) despite looking cheap (94th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (83%) significantly exceeds 252-day (37%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
75.1% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
69.0% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
13.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
55.2% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.900 | —6 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.940 | —6 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.910 | —6 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.150 | —6 | — | |
| F-Score | 6.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.920 | —6 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.369 | —0 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
10.60
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1166
Price / Sales
1.30
Price / Book
2.06
Price / Cash Flow
9.54
FCF Yield
10.6%
EBITDA / EV
13.9%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.7779
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
1.5%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
19.5%
Return on Assets
16.4%
Net Margin
12.3%
Operating Margin
15.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
42.0%
Current Ratio
2.48
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.018
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
9.2%
12M Return
-26.8%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-33.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.91
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
2.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
10.1%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.033
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
6
Dividend Yield
1.5%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
10
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
7
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
10
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
35
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity