Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/4183ed60-3788-4bc5-8265-f59019325817/
LOTUSDEV
SRI LOTUS DEVLPRS N RTY LSnapshot 2026-07-26 · 0.9w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Yes
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
24.0%ile
P/E
29.7×
P/S
9.8×
P/B
4.6×
E/P
0.0437
FCF Yield
-0.040
EBITDA/EV
0.050
SH Yield
-0.084
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
77.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
84.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
83.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-4.0%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 84.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
38.0%ile
ROE
0.156
ROA
0.126
Net Margin
0.331
Op Margin
0.399
GPA
0.188
Current
6.08
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.399
Earn Growth
0.043
Stability
0.306
lower=better
Accruals
0.265
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
Accruals ratio of 0.265 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
57.0%ile
6M Return
18.3%
Vol 252d
47.5%
Vol 60d
114.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-47.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (114%) is expanding vs long-term (47%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.19
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 469 peers
Sector Value %ile
32.6%
Sector Quality %ile
42.1%
P/E z-score
-0.26
P/B z-score
-0.06
Sector Avg OS
45.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GESHIP | 99.0% | 94.0% | 84.0% | 93.0% | |
| GENCON | 98.0% | 96.0% | 85.0% | 71.0% | |
| CORDSCABLE | 97.0% | 98.0% | 72.0% | 70.0% | |
| VISAKAIND | 97.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 63.0% | |
| UNIPARTS | 97.0% | 71.0% | 95.0% | 97.0% | |
| SIS | 97.0% | 83.0% | 90.0% | 82.0% | |
| ARIS | 96.0% | 95.0% | 80.0% | 61.0% | |
| GANDHITUBE | 95.0% | 74.0% | 94.0% | 82.0% |
Factor Interactions
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (16%) but high accruals (0.265) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (114%) significantly exceeds 252-day (47%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
25.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
63.6% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
B
60.4% avg (1 factors)
Risk
D
37.5% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.190 | —8 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.240 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.380 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.570 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 4.000 | —8 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.784 | —8 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.475 | —1 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
29.66
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0437
Price / Sales
9.82
Price / Book
4.61
FCF Yield
-4.0%
EBITDA / EV
5.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1094
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-8.4%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
15.6%
Return on Assets
12.6%
Net Margin
33.1%
Operating Margin
39.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
18.8%
Current Ratio
6.08
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.265
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
18.3%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
39.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
4.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.306
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
4
Buyback Yield
-8.4%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
77
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
84
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
83
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity