Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/41efa685-d7e0-4efa-b912-7cc16c20e5f2/
ABXX
Abaxx Technologies Inc.Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
58.0%ile
P/S
751.6×
P/B
28.5×
FCF Yield
-0.024
SH Yield
-0.026
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
43.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
42.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
42.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-2.4%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
58.0%ile
ROE
-0.863
ROA
-0.543
Net Margin
-22.783
Op Margin
-23.634
Current
3.40
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.078
Stability
0.417
lower=better
Accruals
-0.115
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
60.0%ile
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.69
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Technology
· 40 peers
Sector Value %ile
80.5%
Sector Quality %ile
51.2%
P/B z-score
1.82
Sector Avg OS
32.6%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
0.0% avg (4 factors)
Quality
D
33.3% avg (6 factors)
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.690 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.580 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.580 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.600 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 3.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.576 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | — | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Sales
751.61
Price / Book
28.48
FCF Yield
-2.4%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.0013
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-2.6%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-86.3%
Return on Assets
-54.3%
Net Margin
-2278.3%
Operating Margin
-2363.4%
Current Ratio
3.40
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.115
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
7.8%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.417
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
-2.6%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
43
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
42
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
42
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity