Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/4cf9231e-f6db-44ef-bc6c-0f01f1736514/
WDS
Woodside Energy Group LtdSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
11 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.980
↗
Trending Value
#13.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.908
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 3.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
37.2%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 18%
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +29%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
10.9%
💰
High Yield
Div 10.9%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 52%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.58
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
97.0%ile
P/E
6.5×
P/S
1.6×
P/B
1.1×
E/P
0.1541
FCF Yield
0.544
EBITDA/EV
0.372
SH Yield
0.109
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
4.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
3.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
3.00000000
/100
P/E of 6.5x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 54.4% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 3.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
85.0%ile
ROE
0.175
ROA
0.095
Net Margin
0.241
Op Margin
0.286
GPA
0.148
D/E
0.74
Current
1.59
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.289
Earn Growth
1.431
Stability
0.701
lower=better
Accruals
-0.085
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
85.0%ile
6M Return
32.0%
12M Return
50.0%
12-1 Mom
51.6%
Risk-Adj
1.58
Vol 252d
32.7%
Vol 60d
75.1%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-16.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 52% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 1.58 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (75%) is expanding vs long-term (33%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.98
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Energy
· 226 peers
Sector Value %ile
99.1%
Sector Quality %ile
75.8%
P/E z-score
-0.77
P/B z-score
-0.07
Sector Avg OS
71.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (97th) and quality (85th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (97th value) with strong momentum (85th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 29% with P/E of 6×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 10.9% backed by 54.4% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (75%) significantly exceeds 252-day (33%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
97.1% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
67.4% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
A
82.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
62.1% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.980 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.970 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.850 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.850 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 4.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.894 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.327 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
6.49
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1541
Price / Sales
1.56
Price / Book
1.14
Price / Cash Flow
3.42
FCF Yield
54.4%
EBITDA / EV
37.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.5535
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
10.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
17.5%
Return on Assets
9.5%
Net Margin
24.1%
Operating Margin
28.6%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
14.8%
Debt / Equity
0.74
Current Ratio
1.59
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.085
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
32.0%
12M Return
50.0%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
51.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.58
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
28.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
143.1%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.701
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
10.9%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
4
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
3
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
3
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
13
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity