Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/50567429-5795-460d-824f-999d0a4c0927/
NMDC
NMDC LimitedSnapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.7w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
11 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.980
↗
Trending Value
#37
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.860
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 10
📐
EBITDA/EV
13.5%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
Yes
🌱
GARP
Rev +34%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
4.1%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 38%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
Vol 25%
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.51
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
88.0%ile
P/E
10.3×
P/S
2.3×
P/B
2.2×
E/P
0.1088
FCF Yield
0.023
EBITDA/EV
0.135
SH Yield
0.041
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
17.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
10.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
12.00000000
/100
P/E of 10.3x places this firmly in deep value territory. VC2 score of 10.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
84.0%ile
ROE
0.212
ROA
0.150
Net Margin
0.221
Op Margin
0.269
GPA
0.324
Current
2.43
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.342
Earn Growth
0.139
Stability
0.120
lower=better
Accruals
0.046
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 21% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
86.0%ile
6M Return
8.7%
12M Return
28.5%
12-1 Mom
37.6%
Risk-Adj
1.51
Vol 252d
25.0%
Vol 60d
58.2%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-9.7%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 38% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 1.51 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (58%) is expanding vs long-term (25%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.98
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 371 peers
Sector Value %ile
82.3%
Sector Quality %ile
88.4%
P/E z-score
-0.18
P/B z-score
-0.26
Sector Avg OS
54.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONALUM | 99.0% | 87.0% | 98.0% | 97.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 97.0% | 92.0% | 81.0% | |
| ARIES | 99.0% | 98.0% | 93.0% | 69.0% | |
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 90.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 99.0% | 88.0% | 98.0% | 86.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 88.0% | 88.0% | 84.0% | |
| GANESHBE | 98.0% | 94.0% | 79.0% | 74.0% | |
| ZUARI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 65.0% | 79.0% |
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (88th) and quality (84th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (88th value) with strong momentum (86th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 34% with P/E of 10×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (58%) significantly exceeds 252-day (25%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
68.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
71.5% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
B
64.8% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
75.1% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.980 | —6 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.880 | —6 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.840 | —6 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.860 | —6 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.920 | —6 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.250 | —0 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
10.33
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1088
Price / Sales
2.28
Price / Book
2.19
Price / Cash Flow
14.94
FCF Yield
2.3%
EBITDA / EV
13.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.4040
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
4.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
21.2%
Return on Assets
15.0%
Net Margin
22.1%
Operating Margin
26.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
32.4%
Current Ratio
2.43
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.046
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
8.7%
12M Return
28.5%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
37.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.51
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
34.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
13.9%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.120
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
4.1%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
17
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
10
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
12
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
37
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity