Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/50b67818-7ba6-49a3-8646-7373632ff606/

PDD

PDD Holdings Inc.
Chart
$85.07
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.89
OS Score
99.0%
Value
83.0%
Quality
16.0%
Momentum
#87.00000000
TV Rank
4/9
F-Score
0.906
QV
Strategy Eligibility
8 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.890
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.906
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.3
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 3.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
86.6%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
ROE 23%
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Yes
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
99.0%ile
P/E
1.3×
P/S
0.3×
P/B
0.3×
E/P
0.7685
FCF Yield
0.918
EBITDA/EV
0.866
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
2.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
3.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
3.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.3x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 91.8% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 3.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
83.0%ile
ROE
0.229
ROA
0.152
Net Margin
0.220
Op Margin
0.248
GPA
0.388
D/E
0.51
Current
2.54
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.093
Earn Growth
-0.024
Stability
0.296
lower=better
Accruals
-0.030
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 23% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
16.0%ile
6M Return
-27.7%
12M Return
-15.4%
12-1 Mom
-1.8%
Risk-Adj
-0.05
Vol 252d
34.3%
Vol 60d
74.7%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-37.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (75%) is expanding vs long-term (34%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.89
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Consumer Cyclical · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
100.0%
Sector Quality %ile
85.6%
P/E z-score
-0.33
P/B z-score
-0.52
Sector Avg OS
54.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
BWMX Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. 99.0% 98.0% 93.0% 95.0%
SBH Sally Beauty Holdings Inc 98.0% 95.0% 92.0% 84.0%
KSS Kohl's Corporation 98.0% 98.0% 74.0% 90.0%
HTHT Huazhu Group Ltd 98.0% 96.0% 94.0% 79.0%
CYD China Yuchai International Limited 98.0% 99.0% 71.0% 97.0%
FLXS Flexsteel Industries Inc 98.0% 93.0% 79.0% 91.0%
M Macy’s Inc 98.0% 97.0% 81.0% 90.0%
STRT Strattec Security Corporation 97.0% 95.0% 82.0% 76.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (99th) and quality (83th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (16th) despite looking cheap (99th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (75%) significantly exceeds 252-day (34%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
87.3% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
79.3% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
18.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
59.5% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.890—1
Value %ile0.990—1
Quality %ile0.830—1
Momentum %ile0.160—1
F-Score4.000—1
Confidence1.000—1
Volatility0.343—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.30
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.7685
Price / Sales
0.29
Price / Book
0.30
Price / Cash Flow
1.09
FCF Yield
91.8%
EBITDA / EV
86.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
3.4951
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
22.9%
Return on Assets
15.2%
Net Margin
22.0%
Operating Margin
24.8%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
38.8%
Debt / Equity
0.51
Current Ratio
2.54
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.030
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-27.7%
12M Return
-15.4%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-1.8%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.05
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
9.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-2.4%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.296
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
2
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
3
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
3
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
87
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
Yes
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity