Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/8debbbfa-b555-4b9c-9bde-0ccbfbf2ea87/
BWMX
Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V.Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
11 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.990
↗
Trending Value
#13.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.955
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 0.6
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 1.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
62.6%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
127.2%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 122%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 98th
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 2.76
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
98.0%ile
P/E
0.6×
P/S
0.0×
P/B
0.5×
E/P
1.7533
FCF Yield
0.341
EBITDA/EV
0.626
SH Yield
1.272
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
1.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
1.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
1.00000000
/100
P/E of 0.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 34.1% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 1.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
93.0%ile
ROE
0.809
ROA
0.123
Net Margin
0.084
Op Margin
0.165
GPA
0.979
D/E
5.59
Current
0.93
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.018
Earn Growth
1.093
Stability
0.667
lower=better
Accruals
-0.028
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 81% is exceptional. Highly leveraged with D/E of 5.59 — returns are being amplified by debt.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
95.0%ile
6M Return
32.7%
12M Return
145.9%
12-1 Mom
122.4%
Risk-Adj
2.76
Vol 252d
44.3%
Vol 60d
82.1%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-13.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 122% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 2.76 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (82%) is expanding vs long-term (44%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.99
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Consumer Cyclical
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
98.6%
Sector Quality %ile
94.6%
P/E z-score
-0.34
P/B z-score
-0.49
Sector Avg OS
54.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (98th) and quality (93th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (98th value) with strong momentum (95th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 127.2% backed by 34.1% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (95th) but high volatility (44%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Leveraged Returns
Strong ROE (81%) boosted by high leverage (D/E 5.6). Returns look good but come with balance sheet risk.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (82%) significantly exceeds 252-day (44%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
100.0% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
57.0% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
A
93.1% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
42.9% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is confirming the value — this is the Trending Value signal that O'Shaughnessy found to be among the most powerful. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.990 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.980 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.930 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.950 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 7.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.970 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.443 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
0.57
Earnings Yield (E/P)
1.7533
Price / Sales
0.05
Price / Book
0.46
Price / Cash Flow
0.46
FCF Yield
34.1%
EBITDA / EV
62.6%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
3.1483
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
127.2%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
80.9%
Return on Assets
12.3%
Net Margin
8.4%
Operating Margin
16.5%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
97.9%
Debt / Equity
5.59
Current Ratio
0.93
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.028
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
32.7%
12M Return
145.9%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
122.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
2.76
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
1.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
109.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.667
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
1
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
1
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
1
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
13
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity