Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/57883de9-7081-4db7-94e3-68b450a5e5d5/

CEK

CeoTronics AG
Chart
9.92 EUR
Latest Week 2026-07-10
Snapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.7w · Fresh
0.81
OS Score
77.0%
Value
92.0%
Quality
11.0%
Momentum
7/9
F-Score
0.842
QV
Strategy Eligibility
6 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.810
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.842
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
12.3%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
Rev +88%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 77%
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
77.0%ile
P/E
16.7×
P/S
1.4×
P/B
2.6×
E/P
0.1107
FCF Yield
0.165
EBITDA/EV
0.123
SH Yield
-0.039
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
34.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
61.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
42.00000000
/100
FCF yield of 16.5% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
92.0%ile
ROE
0.154
ROA
0.106
Net Margin
0.085
Op Margin
0.152
GPA
0.510
Current
10.15
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.883
Earn Growth
2.449
Accruals
-0.225
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
11.0%ile
6M Return
-29.4%
12M Return
-27.1%
12-1 Mom
-31.8%
Risk-Adj
-0.61
Vol 252d
52.5%
Vol 60d
100.3%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-43.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -32% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (100%) is expanding vs long-term (52%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.81
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Technology · 121 peers
Sector Value %ile
89.3%
Sector Quality %ile
84.4%
P/E z-score
-0.16
P/B z-score
-0.46
Sector Avg OS
42.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ERCB Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) 99.0% 99.0% 75.0% 95.0%
ERCG Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) 99.0% 99.0% 75.0% 94.0%
F3A First Solar, Inc. 94.0% 68.0% 88.0% 83.0%
CSH CENIT Aktiengesellschaft 92.0% 95.0% 79.0% 28.0%
FAA Fabasoft AG 84.0% 78.0% 97.0% 18.0%
OBS ORBIS AG 83.0% 93.0% 63.0% 16.0%
HRPK 7C Solarparken AG 82.0% 78.0% 73.0% 31.0%
NA9 Nagarro SE 81.0% 60.0% 77.0% 58.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (77th) and quality (92th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 88% with P/E of 17×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (11th) despite looking cheap (77th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (100%) significantly exceeds 252-day (52%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
67.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
71.4% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
F
3.5% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
29.2% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.810—6
Value %ile0.770—6
Quality %ile0.920—6
Momentum %ile0.110—6
F-Score7.000—6
Confidence0.720—6
Volatility0.525—6
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
16.70
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1107
Price / Sales
1.42
Price / Book
2.58
Price / Cash Flow
5.34
FCF Yield
16.5%
EBITDA / EV
12.3%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.7262
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-3.9%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
15.4%
Return on Assets
10.6%
Net Margin
8.5%
Operating Margin
15.2%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
51.0%
Current Ratio
10.15
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.225
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-29.4%
12M Return
-27.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-31.8%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.61
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
88.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
244.9%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
2.0%
Buyback Yield
-5.9%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
34
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
61
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
42
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity