Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/59057d00-abf7-45c3-805c-8edd2c6b2989/

BTI

Bailador Technology Investments Limited
Chart
1.01 AUD
Latest Week 2026-07-24
Financial ServicesAsset ManagementMICRO
Snapshot 2026-07-19 · 1.0w · Fresh
0.49
OS Score
88.0%
Value
8.0%
Quality
13.0%
Momentum
#56.00000000
TV Rank
1/9
F-Score
0.265
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
2 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 6
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
7.5%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
88.0%ile
P/E
7.9×
P/S
3.9×
P/B
0.6×
FCF Yield
-0.135
SH Yield
0.075
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
8.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
6.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
6.00000000
/100
P/E of 7.9x places this firmly in deep value territory. Negative FCF yield (-13.5%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 6.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
8.0%ile
ROE
0.079
ROA
0.069
Net Margin
0.492
F-Score
1/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.024
Earn Growth
-0.081
5yr Consist
No
F-Score of 1/9 flags fundamental deterioration — multiple signals are weakening.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
13.0%ile
6M Return
-18.0%
12M Return
-8.9%
12-1 Mom
-13.9%
Risk-Adj
-0.61
Vol 252d
22.9%
Vol 60d
53.2%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-23.7%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -14% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (53%) is expanding vs long-term (23%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.49
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services · 159 peers
Sector Value %ile
81.2%
Sector Quality %ile
5.0%
P/E z-score
-0.36
P/B z-score
-0.09
Sector Avg OS
53.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
HLI Helia Group Limited 99.0% 96.0% 96.0% 92.0%
TWR Tower Limited 99.0% 98.0% 95.0% 88.0%
SVR Solvar Limited 98.0% 96.0% 96.0% 85.0%
ACQ Acorn Capital Investment Fund Limited 97.0% 92.0% 88.0% 89.0%
BFL BSP Financial Group Limited 97.0% 95.0% 89.0% 83.0%
KSL Kina Securities Limited 97.0% 96.0% 85.0% 83.0%
PNC Pioneer Credit Limited 97.0% 88.0% 91.0% 93.0%
HGH Heartland Group Holdings Limited 96.0% 89.0% 84.0% 94.0%
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (88th value) but weak quality (8th). Classic value trap risk.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (13th) despite looking cheap (88th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (53%) significantly exceeds 252-day (23%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
72.5% avg (5 factors)
Quality
C
52.3% avg (3 factors)
Momentum
F
15.7% avg (4 factors)
Risk
A
78.6% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends7 snapshots
Factor Persistence7 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.490—0—
Value %ile0.880—7—
Quality %ile0.080—7—
Momentum %ile0.130—7—
F-Score1.000—7—
Confidence0.345—7—
Volatility0.229—0—
Value Lens2021-07-20 → 2026-07-19
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
7.85
Price / Sales
3.87
Price / Book
0.62
FCF Yield
-13.5%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.2870
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
7.5%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
7.9%
Return on Assets
6.9%
Net Margin
49.2%
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-18.0%
12M Return
-8.9%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-13.9%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.61
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-2.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-8.1%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
1
Dividend Yield
7.5%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
8
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
6
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
6
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
56
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity