Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/660f60ee-84e7-4a1e-97e8-2fea191df290/
DXR
Daxor CorporationSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
69.0%ile
P/E
5.8×
P/S
5.2×
P/B
1.2×
E/P
0.1710
FCF Yield
0.011
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
69.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
71.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
68.00000000
/100
P/E of 5.8x places this firmly in deep value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
17.0%ile
ROE
0.200
ROA
0.199
Net Margin
0.890
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
3.835
Accruals
0.187
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
Accruals ratio of 0.187 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
30.0%ile
6M Return
-17.5%
12M Return
14.6%
12-1 Mom
7.6%
Risk-Adj
0.20
Vol 252d
38.5%
Vol 60d
81.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-34.1%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (82%) is expanding vs long-term (39%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.45
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Healthcare
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
81.4%
Sector Quality %ile
5.2%
P/E z-score
-0.35
P/B z-score
-0.32
Sector Avg OS
63.3%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (69th value) but weak quality (17th). Classic value trap risk.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 384% with P/E of 6×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (20%) but high accruals (0.187) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (82%) significantly exceeds 252-day (39%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
B
64.8% avg (6 factors)
Quality
B
64.2% avg (4 factors)
Momentum
D
34.6% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
52.4% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.450 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.690 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.170 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.300 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 4.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.650 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.385 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
5.85
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1710
Price / Sales
5.21
Price / Book
1.17
Price / Cash Flow
93.94
FCF Yield
1.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.1912
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
20.0%
Return on Assets
19.9%
Net Margin
89.0%
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.187
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-17.5%
12M Return
14.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
7.6%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
0.20
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
383.5%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
0.0%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
69
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
71
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
68
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity