Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/712faff9-b2b2-48b4-9e16-1447b70e8837/

JBS

JBS N.V.
Chart
$12.24
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.95
OS Score
98.0%
Value
72.0%
Quality
65.0%
Momentum
#65.00000000
TV Rank
7/9
F-Score
0.840
QV
Strategy Eligibility
10 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.950
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.840
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
P/S 0.0
💎
Deep Value
P/E 1.4
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 1.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
145.7%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
F7
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
Noneyr
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
55.3%
💰
High Yield
Div 55.3%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
98.0%ile
P/E
1.4×
P/S
0.0×
P/B
0.3×
E/P
0.7235
FCF Yield
1.223
EBITDA/EV
1.457
SH Yield
0.553
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
1.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
1.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
1.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.4x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 122.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 1.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
72.0%ile
ROE
0.225
ROA
0.041
Net Margin
0.020
Op Margin
0.044
GPA
0.252
D/E
4.39
Current
1.50
F-Score
7/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.080
Earn Growth
-0.124
Stability
0.335
lower=better
Accruals
-0.024
lower=better
5yr Consist
Yes
ROE of 22% is exceptional. Highly leveraged with D/E of 4.39 — returns are being amplified by debt.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
65.0%ile
6M Return
-8.1%
Vol 252d
40.1%
Vol 60d
93.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-28.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (93%) is expanding vs long-term (40%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.95
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Consumer Defensive · 236 peers
Sector Value %ile
99.6%
Sector Quality %ile
72.6%
P/E z-score
-0.50
P/B z-score
-0.18
Sector Avg OS
49.9%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
ABEV Ambev SA ADR 99.0% 98.0% 97.0% 80.0%
VFF Village Farms International Inc 98.0% 97.0% 78.0% 91.0%
HLF Herbalife Nutrition Ltd 97.0% 95.0% 72.0% 86.0%
SENEB Seneca Foods Corp B 97.0% 94.0% 73.0% 86.0%
DDL Dingdong (Cayman) Limited ADR 96.0% 99.0% 73.0% 71.0%
SENEA Seneca Foods Corp A 96.0% 94.0% 74.0% 84.0%
NATR Natures Sunshine Products Inc 95.0% 81.0% 86.0% 82.0%
BTI British American Tobacco p.l.c. 94.0% 75.0% 94.0% 77.0%
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (98th) and quality (72th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 55.3% backed by 122.3% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Leveraged Returns
Strong ROE (22%) boosted by high leverage (D/E 4.4). Returns look good but come with balance sheet risk.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (93%) significantly exceeds 252-day (40%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
100.0% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
36.9% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
27.4% avg (1 factors)
Risk
C
49.8% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.950—1
Value %ile0.980—1
Quality %ile0.720—1
Momentum %ile0.650—0
F-Score7.000—1
Confidence0.939—1
Volatility0.401—1
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.38
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.7235
Price / Sales
0.03
Price / Book
0.31
Price / Cash Flow
0.87
FCF Yield
122.3%
EBITDA / EV
145.7%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
20.7982
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
55.3%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
22.5%
Return on Assets
4.1%
Net Margin
2.0%
Operating Margin
4.4%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
25.2%
Debt / Equity
4.39
Current Ratio
1.50
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.024
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-8.1%
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
8.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-12.4%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.335
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
Yes
Piotroski F-Score
7
Dividend Yield
55.3%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
1
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
1
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
1
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
65
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity