Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/74fd345e-2aaf-43f3-8019-251febb44912/
CORDELIA
WATERWAYS LEISURE TOUR LSnapshot 2026-07-26 · 0.9w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
2.0%ile
P/E
112.0×
P/S
10.1×
P/B
177.0×
E/P
0.0145
FCF Yield
-0.019
EBITDA/EV
0.020
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
95.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
97.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
91.00000000
/100
P/E of 112.0x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. Negative FCF yield (-1.9%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive. VC2 score of 97.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
38.0%ile
ROE
1.581
ROA
0.211
Net Margin
0.090
Op Margin
0.147
GPA
0.686
Current
0.77
F-Score
2/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.017
Earn Growth
-0.690
Accruals
0.601
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 158% is exceptional. Accruals ratio of 0.601 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest. F-Score of 2/9 flags fundamental deterioration — multiple signals are weakening.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
56.0%ile
Max DD 12M
-6.5%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.07
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Industrials
· 469 peers
Sector Value %ile
4.9%
Sector Quality %ile
42.1%
P/E z-score
0.82
P/B z-score
17.24
Sector Avg OS
45.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GESHIP | 99.0% | 94.0% | 84.0% | 93.0% | |
| GENCON | 98.0% | 96.0% | 85.0% | 71.0% | |
| SIS | 97.0% | 83.0% | 90.0% | 82.0% | |
| VISAKAIND | 97.0% | 98.0% | 76.0% | 63.0% | |
| CORDSCABLE | 97.0% | 98.0% | 72.0% | 70.0% | |
| UNIPARTS | 97.0% | 71.0% | 95.0% | 97.0% | |
| ARIS | 96.0% | 95.0% | 80.0% | 61.0% | |
| GANDHITUBE | 95.0% | 74.0% | 94.0% | 82.0% |
Factor Interactions
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (158%) but high accruals (0.601) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
9.3% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
59.1% avg (7 factors)
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.070 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.020 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.380 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.560 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 2.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.668 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | — | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
111.96
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0145
Price / Sales
10.08
Price / Book
177.00
FCF Yield
-1.9%
EBITDA / EV
2.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.0989
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
158.1%
Return on Assets
21.1%
Net Margin
9.0%
Operating Margin
14.7%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
68.6%
Current Ratio
0.77
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.601
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-1.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-69.0%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
2
Buyback Yield
-0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
95
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
97
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
91
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity