Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/8273db9f-e5a5-4a33-96e0-20bd15ecfe85/

OOMA

Ooma Inc
Chart
20.02 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-24
TechnologySoftware - ApplicationSMALL
Snapshot 2026-07-26 · 0.6w · Fresh
0.37
OS Score
7.0%
Value
71.0%
Quality
88.0%
Momentum
5/9
F-Score
0.223
QV
StrategiesValueQualityMomentumCompositeInteractionsFactor AnalysisTrendsFundamentals
Strategy Eligibility
5 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
Yes
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
2.8%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 55%
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.68
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.54
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
7.0%ile
P/E
59.9×
P/S
1.9×
P/B
5.7×
E/P
0.0134
FCF Yield
0.060
EBITDA/EV
0.041
SH Yield
0.028
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
91.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
87.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
89.00000000
/100
P/E of 59.9x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. FCF yield of 6.0% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 87.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
71.0%ile
ROE
0.096
ROA
0.040
Net Margin
0.032
Op Margin
0.028
GPA
0.783
D/E
1.37
Current
0.94
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.117
Stability
4.106
lower=better
Accruals
-0.093
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
88.0%ile
6M Return
65.7%
12M Return
67.7%
12-1 Mom
54.5%
Risk-Adj
1.54
Vol 252d
35.3%
Vol 60d
81.6%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-15.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 55% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 1.54 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (82%) is expanding vs long-term (35%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.37
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Technology · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
14.0%
Sector Quality %ile
62.9%
P/E z-score
0.01
P/B z-score
-0.07
Sector Avg OS
51.6%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
UMC United Microelectronics 99.0% 99.0% 80.0% 97.0%
TOYO TOYO Co., Ltd Ordinary Shares 99.0% 97.0% 97.0% 82.0%
TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing 99.0% 98.0% 98.0% 90.0%
ASX ASE Industrial Holding Co Ltd ADR 99.0% 98.0% 84.0% 98.0%
ERIC Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson B ADR 99.0% 99.0% 93.0% 78.0%
CCSI Consensus Cloud Solutions Inc 98.0% 87.0% 98.0% 91.0%
PLAB Photronics Inc 98.0% 94.0% 86.0% 86.0%
VISN CommScope Holding Company, Inc. 98.0% 95.0% 77.0% 98.0%
Factor Interactions
Quality Momentum — Expensive
Strong quality (71th) and momentum (88th) but expensive (7th value). Premium priced — watch for mean reversion.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (71th) but expensive (7th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (82%) significantly exceeds 252-day (35%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
D
35.5% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
47.2% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
A
90.9% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
57.8% avg (1 factors)
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.370—0—
Value %ile0.070—8—
Quality %ile0.710—8—
Momentum %ile0.880—8—
F-Score5.000—0—
Confidence0.909—8—
Volatility0.353—0—
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
59.90
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0134
Price / Sales
1.90
Price / Book
5.74
Price / Cash Flow
18.10
FCF Yield
6.0%
EBITDA / EV
4.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.4822
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
2.8%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
9.6%
Return on Assets
4.0%
Net Margin
3.2%
Operating Margin
2.8%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
78.3%
Debt / Equity
1.37
Current Ratio
0.94
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.093
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.087
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
65.7%
12M Return
67.7%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
54.5%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.54
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
11.7%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
4.106
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Buyback Yield
2.8%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
91
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
87
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
89
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
Yes
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity