Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/852fa7bd-ef2a-415a-b99c-90dd8ea091bc/
PASW
Ping An Biomedical Co., Ltd.Snapshot 2026-07-26 · 0.7w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
46.0%ile
P/S
0.5×
P/B
0.3×
FCF Yield
-0.260
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
55.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
55.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
55.00000000
/100
Negative FCF yield (-26.0%) — the business is currently cash-consumptive.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
44.0%ile
ROE
-0.284
ROA
-0.188
Net Margin
-0.376
Op Margin
-0.421
GPA
0.014
D/E
0.51
Current
2.76
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.610
Accruals
-0.094
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
46.0%ile
Max DD 12M
-30.1%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.43
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Consumer Cyclical
· 486 peers
Sector Value %ile
42.1%
Sector Quality %ile
53.4%
P/B z-score
-0.11
Sector Avg OS
50.4%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
C
52.5% avg (4 factors)
Quality
D
34.7% avg (8 factors)
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.430 | —0 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.460 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.440 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.460 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 4.000 | —8 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.429 | —0 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.988 | —1 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Price / Sales
0.45
Price / Book
0.34
FCF Yield
-26.0%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.3803
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
-28.4%
Return on Assets
-18.8%
Net Margin
-37.6%
Operating Margin
-42.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
1.4%
Debt / Equity
0.51
Current Ratio
2.76
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.094
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-61.0%
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Dividend Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
55
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
55
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
55
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity