Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/8892b55a-d8cb-4a74-a269-bf41c624ccd4/
TWOU
2U IncSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
0 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
✗
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
✗
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
✗
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
36.0%ile
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
64.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
64.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
64.00000000
/100
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
36.0%ile
ROE
2.154
ROA
-0.646
Net Margin
-0.691
Op Margin
-0.529
GPA
0.719
D/E
-4.33
Current
0.15
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.069
Stability
1.202
lower=better
Accruals
-0.797
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 215% is exceptional. Conservative balance sheet with D/E of -4.33.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
36.0%ile
Vol 252d
0.0%
Vol 60d
0.0%
↓ Contracting
Max DD 12M
0.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.22
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Consumer Defensive
· 236 peers
Sector Value %ile
33.3%
Sector Quality %ile
43.0%
Sector Avg OS
50.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Quality
C
50.0% avg (8 factors)
Risk
A
100.0% avg (1 factors)
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.220 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.360 | —0 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.360 | —0 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.360 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 3.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.218 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.000 | —1 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
215.4%
Return on Assets
-64.6%
Net Margin
-69.1%
Operating Margin
-52.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
71.9%
Debt / Equity
-4.33
Current Ratio
0.15
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.797
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-6.9%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.202
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
64
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
64
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
64
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity