Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/8b2cdfc1-cdbe-40e1-9727-973e2f45def3/
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.Snapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.7w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
6 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.860
↗
Trending Value
✗
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.910
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
✗
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 9
📐
EBITDA/EV
18.4%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
✗
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
✗
🔄
Shareholder Yield
8.1%
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.91
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
91.0%ile
P/E
9.3×
P/S
1.2×
P/B
2.8×
E/P
0.1473
FCF Yield
0.183
EBITDA/EV
0.184
SH Yield
0.081
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
12.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
9.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
11.00000000
/100
P/E of 9.3x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 18.3% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 9.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
91.0%ile
ROE
0.302
ROA
0.171
Net Margin
0.130
Op Margin
0.186
GPA
0.731
D/E
0.77
Current
2.23
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.042
Earn Growth
-0.193
Stability
0.431
lower=better
Accruals
-0.056
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 30% is exceptional.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
9.0%ile
6M Return
-41.5%
12M Return
-49.6%
12-1 Mom
-49.8%
Risk-Adj
-1.12
Vol 252d
44.4%
Vol 60d
95.4%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-51.4%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -50% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (95%) is expanding vs long-term (44%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.86
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Consumer Cyclical
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
90.0%
Sector Quality %ile
93.8%
P/E z-score
-0.23
P/B z-score
-0.07
Sector Avg OS
49.8%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (91th) and quality (91th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (9th) despite looking cheap (91th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 8.1% backed by 18.3% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (95%) significantly exceeds 252-day (44%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
91.9% avg (7 factors)
Quality
A
79.0% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
0.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
42.6% avg (1 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.860 | —6 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.910 | —6 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.910 | —6 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.090 | —6 | — | |
| F-Score | 5.000 | —0 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.970 | —6 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.444 | —6 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
9.28
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1473
Price / Sales
1.21
Price / Book
2.81
Price / Cash Flow
7.00
FCF Yield
18.3%
EBITDA / EV
18.4%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.7910
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
8.1%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
30.2%
Return on Assets
17.1%
Net Margin
13.0%
Operating Margin
18.6%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
73.1%
Debt / Equity
0.77
Current Ratio
2.23
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.056
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.131
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-41.5%
12M Return
-49.6%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-49.8%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-1.12
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
4.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-19.3%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.431
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Buyback Yield
8.1%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
12
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
9
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
11
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
92
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity