Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/8e5d7b6f-961c-47d1-88c6-1f484b726a2f/

LQDA

Liquidia Technologies Inc
Chart
79.94 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-17
Snapshot 2026-07-19 · 0.6w · Fresh
0.51
OS Score
0.0%
Value
96.0%
Quality
99.0%
Momentum
5/9
F-Score
0.000
QV
Strategy Eligibility
1 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 5.98
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
0.0%ile
P/E
318.7×
P/S
24.7×
P/B
65.5×
E/P
0.0074
FCF Yield
0.008
EBITDA/EV
0.008
SH Yield
0.000
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
100.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
100.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
100.00000000
/100
P/E of 318.7x is premium-priced — the market is paying up for expected growth. VC2 score of 100.00000000/100 — expensive across all six composite measures.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
96.0%ile
ROE
0.205
ROA
0.056
Net Margin
0.077
Op Margin
0.181
GPA
0.658
D/E
2.70
Current
2.22
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Stability
2.501
lower=better
Accruals
-0.064
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 21% is exceptional. Highly leveraged with D/E of 2.70 — returns are being amplified by debt.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
99.0%ile
6M Return
110.8%
12M Return
449.8%
12-1 Mom
388.8%
Risk-Adj
5.98
Vol 252d
65.0%
Vol 60d
134.8%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-27.9%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 389% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Risk-adjusted momentum of 5.98 is excellent — strong returns relative to volatility. Near-term vol (135%) is expanding vs long-term (65%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.51
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Healthcare · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
0.2%
Sector Quality %ile
95.8%
P/E z-score
6.04
P/B z-score
2.92
Sector Avg OS
64.1%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
FBIOP Fortress Biotech Inc Pref Series A 99.0% 98.0% 84.0% 96.0%
IRWD Ironwood Pharmaceuticals Inc 99.0% 92.0% 91.0% 98.0%
RIGL Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc 98.0% 90.0% 93.0% 93.0%
FBIO Fortress Biotech Inc 98.0% 98.0% 84.0% 88.0%
TBPH Theravance Biopharma Inc 98.0% 90.0% 99.0% 84.0%
NUTX Nutex Health Inc 98.0% 91.0% 98.0% 80.0%
CGEN Compugen 98.0% 89.0% 96.0% 82.0%
MD Mednax Inc 97.0% 85.0% 84.0% 93.0%
Factor Interactions
Quality Momentum — Expensive
Strong quality (96th) and momentum (99th) but expensive (0th value). Premium priced — watch for mean reversion.
Hot but Volatile
Strong momentum (99th) but high volatility (65%). Momentum could reverse sharply.
Leveraged Returns
Strong ROE (21%) boosted by high leverage (D/E 2.7). Returns look good but come with balance sheet risk.
Quality at a Premium
High quality (96th) but expensive (0th value). Upside may be limited without earnings growth.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (135%) significantly exceeds 252-day (65%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
F
5.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
B
60.3% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
A
100.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
F
8.4% avg (1 factors)
High quality business commanding a premium price. The market recognises the quality — returns from here depend on continued fundamental execution. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends7 snapshots
Factor Persistence7 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.510—0
Value %ile0.000—7
Quality %ile0.960—7
Momentum %ile0.990—7
F-Score5.000—0
Confidence0.910—7
Volatility0.650—7
Value Lens2021-07-20 → 2026-07-19
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
318.71
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.0074
Price / Sales
24.68
Price / Book
65.47
Price / Cash Flow
148.15
FCF Yield
0.8%
EBITDA / EV
0.8%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.0407
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.0%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
20.5%
Return on Assets
5.6%
Net Margin
7.7%
Operating Margin
18.1%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
65.8%
Debt / Equity
2.70
Current Ratio
2.22
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.064
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
110.8%
12M Return
449.8%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
388.8%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
5.98
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
2.501
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
100
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
100
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
100
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity