Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/a6a819ae-b653-41c8-95a9-7694cdd560e8/

CIG

Companhia Energetica de Minas Gerais CEMIG Pref ADR
Chart
$2.09
Latest Week 2026-06-05
Snapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
0.88
OS Score
99.0%
Value
15.0%
Quality
77.0%
Momentum
#32.00000000
TV Rank
4/9
F-Score
0.385
QV
Strategy Eligibility
7 of 23 passing
OS Composite
OS 0.880
Trending Value
#32.00000000
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 1.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
70.1%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
102.7%
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 43%
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.46
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
99.0%ile
P/E
1.5×
P/S
0.2×
P/B
0.2×
E/P
0.6814
FCF Yield
0.578
EBITDA/EV
0.701
SH Yield
1.027
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
2.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
1.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
1.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.5x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 57.8% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 1.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
15.0%ile
ROE
0.143
ROA
0.060
Net Margin
0.116
Op Margin
0.120
GPA
0.071
D/E
1.36
Current
0.93
F-Score
4/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
-0.119
Earn Growth
-0.418
Stability
0.671
lower=better
Accruals
0.004
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
77.0%ile
6M Return
11.3%
12M Return
27.1%
12-1 Mom
43.4%
Risk-Adj
1.46
Vol 252d
29.8%
Vol 60d
70.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-21.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 43% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (70%) is expanding vs long-term (30%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.88
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Utilities · 109 peers
Sector Value %ile
100.0%
Sector Quality %ile
10.9%
P/E z-score
-0.19
P/B z-score
-0.61
Sector Avg OS
56.7%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
AXIA AXIA Energia 98.0% 96.0% 77.0% 92.0%
EIX Edison International 97.0% 90.0% 85.0% 82.0%
EBR-B Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. - Eletrobrás 97.0% 93.0% 77.0% 87.0%
ENIC Enel Chile SA ADR 95.0% 92.0% 79.0% 74.0%
AES The AES Corporation 95.0% 87.0% 76.0% 82.0%
CMSA CMS Energy Corporation 5.6% JRSUB NT 78 93.0% 98.0% 90.0% 29.0%
FTS Fortis Inc 92.0% 77.0% 87.0% 71.0%
NGG National Grid PLC ADR 92.0% 81.0% 78.0% 71.0%
Factor Interactions
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (99th value) with strong momentum (77th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (99th value) but weak quality (15th). Classic value trap risk.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 102.7% backed by 57.8% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (70%) significantly exceeds 252-day (30%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
100.0% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
41.4% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
B
67.0% avg (4 factors)
Risk
B
66.9% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.880—1
Value %ile0.990—1
Quality %ile0.150—1
Momentum %ile0.770—1
F-Score4.000—1
Confidence1.000—1
Volatility0.298—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.47
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.6814
Price / Sales
0.17
Price / Book
0.21
Price / Cash Flow
1.56
FCF Yield
57.8%
EBITDA / EV
70.1%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
4.5253
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
102.7%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
14.3%
Return on Assets
6.0%
Net Margin
11.6%
Operating Margin
12.0%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
7.1%
Debt / Equity
1.36
Current Ratio
0.93
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.004
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
11.3%
12M Return
27.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
43.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.46
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-11.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-41.8%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.671
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
4
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
2
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
1
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
1
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
32
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity