Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/a6cc5080-9846-4d56-8840-79dc8be6806f/

BABA

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
Chart
112.14 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-24
Snapshot 2026-07-26 · 0.4w · Fresh
0.71
OS Score
98.0%
Value
22.0%
Quality
20.0%
Momentum
#88.00000000
TV Rank
3/9
F-Score
0.464
QV
Strategy Eligibility
4 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
Quality × Value
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 3
📐
EBITDA/EV
26.2%
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
3.4%
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.97
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
98.0%ile
P/E
2.6×
P/S
0.3×
P/B
0.3×
E/P
0.2509
FCF Yield
0.479
EBITDA/EV
0.262
SH Yield
0.034
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
2.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
3.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
3.00000000
/100
P/E of 2.6x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 47.9% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 3.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
22.0%ile
ROE
0.098
ROA
0.054
Net Margin
0.101
Op Margin
0.103
GPA
0.214
D/E
0.74
Current
1.28
F-Score
3/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.027
Earn Growth
-0.204
Stability
0.465
lower=better
Accruals
0.015
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
20.0%ile
6M Return
-34.7%
12M Return
-5.7%
12-1 Mom
-20.3%
Risk-Adj
-0.45
Vol 252d
45.5%
Vol 60d
90.7%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-49.1%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of -20% signals a downtrend — price is moving against you. Near-term vol (91%) is expanding vs long-term (45%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.71
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Consumer Cyclical · 486 peers
Sector Value %ile
99.2%
Sector Quality %ile
29.4%
P/E z-score
-0.27
P/B z-score
-0.11
Sector Avg OS
50.3%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
BWMX Betterware de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. 99.0% 98.0% 95.0% 90.0%
HTHT Huazhu Group Ltd 98.0% 95.0% 92.0% 75.0%
FLXS Flexsteel Industries Inc 98.0% 94.0% 78.0% 94.0%
CYD China Yuchai International Limited 98.0% 99.0% 70.0% 92.0%
M Macy’s Inc 98.0% 96.0% 74.0% 93.0%
SBH Sally Beauty Holdings Inc 97.0% 93.0% 88.0% 82.0%
WEYS Weyco Group Inc 96.0% 91.0% 79.0% 77.0%
RRR Red Rock Resorts Inc 96.0% 86.0% 98.0% 71.0%
Factor Interactions
Cheap for a Reason?
Looks cheap (98th value) but weak quality (22th). Classic value trap risk.
Falling Knife
Weak momentum (20th) despite looking cheap (98th value). Wait for momentum to stabilise.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (91%) significantly exceeds 252-day (45%). Near-term risk is elevated.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
92.7% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
44.9% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
F
11.8% avg (4 factors)
Risk
D
40.9% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators. Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required. Elevated risk profile — position sizing should reflect the higher volatility.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends8 snapshots
Factor Persistence8 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.710—8
Value %ile0.980—8
Quality %ile0.220—8
Momentum %ile0.200—6
F-Score3.000—8
Confidence0.958—8
Volatility0.455—8
Value Lens2021-07-27 → 2026-07-26
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
2.59
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.2509
Price / Sales
0.26
Price / Book
0.25
Price / Cash Flow
3.56
FCF Yield
47.9%
EBITDA / EV
26.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
2.4357
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
3.4%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
9.8%
Return on Assets
5.4%
Net Margin
10.1%
Operating Margin
10.3%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
21.4%
Debt / Equity
0.74
Current Ratio
1.28
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.015
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.005
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
-34.7%
12M Return
-5.7%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-20.3%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.45
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
2.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-20.4%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.465
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
3
Dividend Yield
0.9%
Buyback Yield
2.5%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
2
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
3
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
3
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
88
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity