Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/ad5e1521-8212-44b0-a59f-a9c9acffea16/
ARIES
Aries Agro LimitedSnapshot 2026-07-12 · 0.7w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
10 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.990
↗
Trending Value
#31
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.955
🏛
Cornerstone Value
✗
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 10.4
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 4
📐
EBITDA/EV
18.4%
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +19%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
✗
💰
High Yield
✗
🚀
Momentum Leaders
✗
◉
Market Leaders
✗
◎
Tiny Titans
Yes
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 1.00
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
✗
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
98.0%ile
P/E
10.4×
P/S
0.6×
P/B
1.3×
E/P
0.1618
FCF Yield
0.078
EBITDA/EV
0.184
SH Yield
0.003
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
3.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
4.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
3.00000000
/100
P/E of 10.4x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 7.8% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 4.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
93.0%ile
ROE
0.128
ROA
0.067
Net Margin
0.058
Op Margin
0.105
GPA
0.488
Current
1.69
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
0.189
Earn Growth
0.260
Stability
1.225
lower=better
Accruals
-0.068
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
69.0%ile
6M Return
10.7%
12M Return
-0.2%
12-1 Mom
-2.4%
Risk-Adj
-0.06
Vol 252d
38.5%
Vol 60d
81.7%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-29.8%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
Near-term vol (82%) is expanding vs long-term (39%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.99
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Basic Materials
· 371 peers
Sector Value %ile
99.7%
Sector Quality %ile
95.4%
P/E z-score
-0.18
P/B z-score
-0.47
Sector Avg OS
54.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
| Symbol | Name | OS | Value | Quality | Momentum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAYNECOIND | 99.0% | 90.0% | 98.0% | 98.0% | |
| NATIONALUM | 99.0% | 87.0% | 98.0% | 97.0% | |
| SANDUMA | 99.0% | 88.0% | 98.0% | 86.0% | |
| GULPOLY | 99.0% | 97.0% | 92.0% | 81.0% | |
| GANESHBE | 98.0% | 94.0% | 79.0% | 74.0% | |
| ZUARI | 98.0% | 99.0% | 65.0% | 79.0% | |
| TATASTEEL | 98.0% | 88.0% | 88.0% | 84.0% | |
| NMDC | 98.0% | 88.0% | 84.0% | 86.0% |
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (98th) and quality (93th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (98th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 19% with P/E of 10×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Volatility Expanding
60-day vol (82%) significantly exceeds 252-day (39%). Near-term risk is elevated.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
78.8% avg (7 factors)
Quality
C
54.7% avg (7 factors)
Momentum
D
34.4% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
52.5% avg (1 factors)
Momentum is weak, suggesting the market isn't yet buying this thesis. Patience required.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Score Trends6 snapshots
Factor Persistence6 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.990 | —6 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.980 | —6 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.930 | —6 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.690 | —0 | — | |
| F-Score | 8.000 | —6 | — | |
| Confidence | 0.920 | —6 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.385 | —0 | — |
Value Lens2021-07-13 → 2026-07-12
P/E Ratio
Earnings Yield
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
10.44
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.1618
Price / Sales
0.60
Price / Book
1.34
Price / Cash Flow
5.20
FCF Yield
7.8%
EBITDA / EV
18.4%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
1.5341
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
0.3%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
12.8%
Return on Assets
6.7%
Net Margin
5.8%
Operating Margin
10.5%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
48.8%
Current Ratio
1.69
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.068
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
10.7%
12M Return
-0.2%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
-2.4%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
-0.06
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
18.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
26.0%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.225
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
0.3%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
3
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
4
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
3
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
31
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity