Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/b01a8da2-a66e-4a45-a4aa-bfb7bf27b114/

NSLR

Neostellar Capital Corp.
Chart
10.15 USD
Latest Week 2026-07-31
Snapshot 2026-07-26 · 1.0w · Fresh
0.78
OS Score
63.0%
Value
62.0%
Quality
64.0%
Momentum
5/9
F-Score
0.625
QV
Strategy Eligibility
3 of 23 passing
OS Composite
Trending Value
Quality × Value
QV 0.625
🏛
Cornerstone Value
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
💎
Deep Value
VC2 Cheapest
📐
EBITDA/EV
Veiled Value
Piotroski Bargains
🔬
Quality Compounders
📈
Consistent Earners
🌱
GARP
🔄
Shareholder Yield
💰
High Yield
🚀
Momentum Leaders
Market Leaders
Tiny Titans
🔍
Small Cap Value
Val 63%
🛡
Low Volatility
🏷
Sector Cheapest
🧠
Capital Allocators
CAQ 0.99
Risk-Adj Momentum
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
63.0%ile
P/E
1.3×
P/S
1.2×
P/B
0.7×
FCF Yield
0.112
SH Yield
-0.015
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
37.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
38.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
38.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.3x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 11.2% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
62.0%ile
ROE
0.568
ROA
0.474
Net Margin
0.937
D/E
0.20
F-Score
5/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Stability
1.738
lower=better
Accruals
0.399
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 57% is exceptional. Conservative balance sheet with D/E of 0.20. Accruals ratio of 0.399 is elevated — earnings quality may be lower than headline numbers suggest.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
64.0%ile
Max DD 12M
-16.0%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.78
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
Sector Context
Financial Services · 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
17.8%
Sector Quality %ile
33.3%
P/E z-score
-0.56
P/B z-score
-0.07
Sector Avg OS
85.2%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
SymbolNameOSValueQualityMomentum
IFS Intercorp Financial Services Inc 99.0% 98.0% 83.0% 90.0%
BFH Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. 99.0% 97.0% 88.0% 90.0%
UVE Universal Insurance Holdings Inc 99.0% 97.0% 92.0% 92.0%
RILYL BRC Group Holdings, Inc. 99.0% 95.0% 88.0% 95.0%
BAP Credicorp Ltd 99.0% 97.0% 96.0% 90.0%
SBFG SB Financial Group Inc 98.0% 96.0% 93.0% 76.0%
BBDO Banco Bradesco S/A ADR 98.0% 97.0% 92.0% 79.0%
HG Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. 98.0% 96.0% 81.0% 91.0%
Factor Interactions
Earnings Quality Concern
ROE looks strong (57%) but high accruals (0.399) suggests earnings are accrual-heavy, not cash-backed.
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
77.0% avg (5 factors)
Quality
A
79.0% avg (5 factors)
This stock sits in the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot — cheap AND high quality. Historically, this combination has generated the strongest long-term returns.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
FactorCurrentStreakTrendSpark
OS Composite0.780—1
Value %ile0.630—0
Quality %ile0.620—0
Momentum %ile0.640—0
F-Score5.000—0
Confidence0.552—0
Volatility—0
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.28
Price / Sales
1.20
Price / Book
0.72
Price / Cash Flow
8.12
FCF Yield
11.2%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.7585
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
-1.5%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
56.8%
Return on Assets
47.4%
Net Margin
93.7%
Debt / Equity
0.20
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
0.399
External Financing
Net issuance — lower=better
0.025
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
1.738
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
5
Dividend Yield
2.5%
Buyback Yield
-4.1%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
37
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
38
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
38
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
No
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity