Structured JSON API for this factor page: https://sharemaestro.com/factors/api/tickers/f974ef19-d607-4f9d-9ce7-f06712ae3c3c/
BBDO
Banco Bradesco S/A ADRSnapshot 2026-06-07 · 0.0w · Fresh
Strategy Eligibility
13 of 23 passing
★
OS Composite
OS 0.960
↗
Trending Value
#45.00000000
◆
Quality × Value
QV 0.846
🏛
Cornerstone Value
Div 14.8%
🌿
Cornerstone Growth
✗
💎
Deep Value
P/E 1.3
◇
VC2 Cheapest
VC2 3.00000000
📐
EBITDA/EV
✗
◐
Veiled Value
✗
▣
Piotroski Bargains
F8
🔬
Quality Compounders
✗
📈
Consistent Earners
✗
🌱
GARP
Rev +197%
🔄
Shareholder Yield
14.8%
💰
High Yield
Div 14.8%
🚀
Momentum Leaders
12-1 45%
◉
Market Leaders
Yes
◎
Tiny Titans
✗
🔍
Small Cap Value
✗
🛡
Low Volatility
✗
🏷
Sector Cheapest
✗
🧠
Capital Allocators
✗
⚡
Risk-Adj Momentum
RAM 1.30
V
Value Analysis
Cheapness relative to fundamentals
93.0%ile
P/E
1.3×
P/S
0.1×
P/B
0.9×
E/P
0.7555
FCF Yield
0.088
EBITDA/EV
0.054
SH Yield
0.148
Relative Strength Across Value Dimensions
Multiples & Yields — Decomposition
VC1 (5-Factor)
5.00000000
/100 — 1=cheapest
VC2 (Trending Value)
3.00000000
/100
VC3 (Buyback)
3.00000000
/100
P/E of 1.3x places this firmly in deep value territory. FCF yield of 8.8% is strong — the business generates significant free cash relative to price. VC2 score of 3.00000000/100 puts this in the cheapest decile of the universe — prime Trending Value territory.
Q
Quality Analysis
Profitability, efficiency, balance sheet & earnings quality
77.0%ile
ROE
0.675
ROA
0.050
Net Margin
0.070
Op Margin
0.069
GPA
0.198
D/E
12.54
Current
0.33
F-Score
8/9
Quality Radar — Relative Strength
Profitability & Leverage Breakdown
Rev Growth
1.967
Earn Growth
1.912
Stability
0.668
lower=better
Accruals
-0.049
lower=better
5yr Consist
No
ROE of 68% is exceptional. Highly leveraged with D/E of 12.54 — returns are being amplified by debt. F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions.
M
Momentum & Risk
Price trend, volatility regime, risk-adjusted returns
77.0%ile
6M Return
1.8%
12M Return
25.1%
12-1 Mom
44.7%
Risk-Adj
1.30
Vol 252d
34.3%
Vol 60d
80.0%
↑ Expanding
Max DD 12M
-22.1%
Return Comparison — 6M / 12M / 12-1
Volatility Regime — 60d vs 252d
12-1 momentum of 45% is very strong — a clear uptrend. Near-term vol (80%) is expanding vs long-term (34%) — risk is increasing.
OS
Composite & Factor Heatmap
All factors at a glance
0.96
Pillar Balance — Value / Quality / Momentum
Factor Heatmap — green=strong, red=weak
▦
Sector Context
Financial Services
· 500 peers
Sector Value %ile
85.0%
Sector Quality %ile
53.1%
P/E z-score
-0.61
P/B z-score
-0.07
Sector Avg OS
86.5%
Ticker vs Sector Averages
Relative Valuation Z-Score
Top Sector Peers (By OS)
Factor Interactions
Value + Quality Intersection
Top-tier on both cheapness (93th) and quality (77th) — the O'Shaughnessy sweet spot, historically the strongest long-term combination.
Trending Value Signal
Cheap (93th value) with strong momentum (77th). The market is starting to recognise the value.
Piotroski + Value Convergence
F-Score 8/9 with good value (93th). Strong fundamental improvement in a cheap stock.
Growth at Reasonable Price
Revenue growing 197% with P/E of 1×. Growth isn't fully priced in.
Strong Capital Return
Shareholder yield 14.8% backed by 8.8% FCF yield. Returns are well-funded.
Leveraged Returns
Strong ROE (68%) boosted by high leverage (D/E 12.5). Returns look good but come with balance sheet risk.
⚖
Factor Analysis
Comprehensive factor intelligence — strengths, weaknesses & cross-factor profile
Value
A
85.6% avg (7 factors)
Quality
D
39.8% avg (8 factors)
Momentum
B
62.9% avg (4 factors)
Risk
C
59.5% avg (1 factors)
Deep value territory, but quality is concerning. This is either a turnaround opportunity or a value trap — the F-Score and accruals ratio will be key differentiators.
▲ Top Strengths — highest scoring factors
▼ Key Weaknesses — lowest scoring factors
Factor Persistence1 snapshots
| Factor | Current | Streak | Trend | Spark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OS Composite | 0.960 | —1 | — | |
| Value %ile | 0.930 | —1 | — | |
| Quality %ile | 0.770 | —1 | — | |
| Momentum %ile | 0.770 | —1 | — | |
| F-Score | 8.000 | —1 | — | |
| Confidence | 1.000 | —1 | — | |
| Volatility | 0.343 | —0 | — |
Value FactorsCheapness relative to fundamentals — lower multiples = cheaper
P/E Ratio
1.32
Earnings Yield (E/P)
0.7555
Price / Sales
0.09
Price / Book
0.89
Price / Cash Flow
0.67
FCF Yield
8.8%
EBITDA / EV
5.4%
Sales Yield (1/P·S)
0.5982
Shareholder Yield
Div + net buyback / mktcap
14.8%
Quality FactorsProfitability, efficiency, and balance sheet strength
Return on Equity
67.5%
Return on Assets
5.0%
Net Margin
7.0%
Operating Margin
6.9%
Gross Profit / Assets
Novy-Marx GPA
19.8%
Debt / Equity
12.54
Current Ratio
0.33
Accruals Ratio
(NI-OCF)/Assets — lower=better
-0.049
MomentumPrice trend strength over different horizons
6M Return
1.8%
12M Return
25.1%
12-1 Momentum
Jegadeesh-Titman (skip recent month)
44.7%
Risk-Adjusted Momentum
Mom 12-1 ÷ Vol
1.30
Growth & StabilityEarnings trajectory, consistency, and capital allocation
Revenue Growth (YoY)
196.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
191.2%
Earnings Stability (CV)
Lower = more stable
0.668
5yr Consistent
EPS up every year for 5 years
No
Piotroski F-Score
8
Dividend Yield
14.8%
Buyback Yield
0.0%
O'Shaughnessy CompositesValue Composites (WWOWS 4th Ed) — 1=cheapest, 100=most expensive
VC1 (5-factor)
P/E+P/S+P/B+P/CF+EBITDA/EV
5
VC2 (6-factor)
VC1 + Shareholder Yield — used for Trending Value
3
VC3 (6-factor)
VC1 + Buyback Yield — no dividend preference
3
Trending Value Rank
1=best. Top VC2 decile by 6M momentum
45
Capital Allocation & AlphaAlpha within factors — quality of management decisions
Veiled Value
Expensive by P/B, cheap by everything else
No
Market Leader
Above-avg mcap+revenue, non-utility
Yes
All Stocks Universe
Market cap > $200M
Yes
Tiny Titan
Micro-cap, low P/S, positive momentum
No
Quarterly Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity
Annual Fundamentals
Revenue
Net Income
FCF
Net Margin
Show all
Op Income
OCF
CapEx
Equity